TAM CHIU KAM and Another v. CHUI YAN TAI
The court found that the presumption of advancement applied to the one third share in the flat and that the defendant failed to rebut it; the estate of Shum Tak Hing is beneficially entitled to the registered one third share. The car park, on the available evidence and inferences as to intention and conduct, was also held to be the deceased's sole property. The court found that a $50,000 advance in late 1992 was a loan payable to the defendant and ordered repayment, with execution stayed pending final orders as to the flat. The court declined to order immediate dispossession of the defendant from the flat and directed further submissions on appropriate orders and costs.
- Citation
- TAM CHIU KAM and Another v. CHUI YAN TAI
- Parties
- Plaintiff (administrator of the Estate of Shum Tak Hing, Deceased): TAM CHIU KAM; Plaintiff (administrator of the Estate of Shum Tak Hing, Deceased): TAM LAP SHUN; Defendant (and Counterclaimant as Administratrix of the Estate of Shum Woon Cheung, Deceased): CHUI YAN TAI
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 April 1997
- Case Number
- HCMP3470/1995
- Procedural Posture
- Partition Proceedings Under the Partition Ordinance (chapter 352), High Court, Hong Kong / Judgment After Trial (hearing 14, 17, 18 & 19 March 1997; Judgment 3 April 1997)
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs succeed in principal claims: the estate of Shum Tak Hing is declared beneficially entitled to the one third share in the flat and to the car park; defendant succeeds on counterclaim only for repayment of $50,000 with stay of execution pending further orders; parties to be heard on ancillary orders and costs.
- Legal Topics
- Partition, Presumption of Advancement, Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust, Loan Repayment, Order for Sale, Possession
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TAM CHIU KAM
Plaintiff (administrator of the Estate of Shum Tak Hing, Deceased)
TAM LAP SHUN
Plaintiff (administrator of the Estate of Shum Tak Hing, Deceased)
CHUI YAN TAI
Defendant (and Counterclaimant as Administratrix of the Estate of Shum Woon Cheung, Deceased)
Procedural Posture
Partition Proceedings Under the Partition Ordinance (chapter 352), High Court, Hong Kong / Judgment After Trial (hearing 14, 17, 18 & 19 March 1997; Judgment 3 April 1997)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the one third share in the flat registered in the name of the deceased (Shum Tak Hing) was held beneficially by him or on trust for the father or defendant
- 2 Whether the car park space registered in the deceased's name was beneficially his or held on trust for the defendant or her husband
- 3 Whether a loan of $50,000 was made by the defendant to the deceased and is repayable by his estate
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the presumption of advancement applied to the one third share in the flat and that the defendant failed to rebut it; the estate of Shum Tak Hing is beneficially entitled to the registered one third share. The car park, on the available evidence and inferences as to intention and conduct, was also held to be the deceased's sole property. The court found that a $50,000 advance in late 1992 was a loan payable to the defendant and ordered repayment, with execution stayed pending final orders as to the flat. The court declined to order immediate dispossession of the defendant from the flat and directed further submissions on appropriate orders and costs.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs succeed in principal claims: the estate of Shum Tak Hing is declared beneficially entitled to the one third share in the flat and to the car park; defendant succeeds on counterclaim only for repayment of $50,000 with stay of execution pending further orders; parties to be heard on ancillary orders and costs.
Orders
- Estate of Shum Tak Hing declared beneficially entitled to one third share in Flat A3, 20th Floor, King\'s Towers, North Point
- Car park space declared to have been sole property of Shum Tak Hing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment