TEAMWELL ENTERPRISES LTD AND ANOTHER v. NG SHING SHE AND ANOTHER
Because the partition was ordered by consent without trial or determination on the merits, and the court was not addressed on detailed merits, the court exercised its discretion to make no general order as to costs between the plaintiffs and the 2nd defendant; however, because the plaintiffs prolonged the proceedings after the 2nd defendant had indicated consent in April 2006, the plaintiffs must pay the costs of the plaintiffs' summons and the 2nd defendant's summons, and costs of partition are to be borne proportionally to the parties' shares.
- Citation
- TEAMWELL ENTERPRISES LTD AND ANOTHER v. NG SHING SHE AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Teamwell Enterprises Limited; 2nd Plaintiff: Harvest Well Industrial Limited; 1st Defendant: Ng Shing She; 2nd Defendant: Prime Centre Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2007
- Case Number
- HCMP1095/2005
- Procedural Posture
- Partition Proceedings Under Partition Ordinance (cap.352) With Related Application Under Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance / Costs Hearing Following Consent Order for Partition; Decision on Costs
- Outcome
- No general order as to costs between the plaintiffs and the 2nd defendant; plaintiffs to pay costs of the plaintiffs' summons and the 2nd defendant's summons to the 2nd defendant; costs of partition to be borne by the parties in proportion to their shares in the Land.
- Legal Topics
- Partition, Costs of Litigation, Consent Orders, Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Teamwell Enterprises Limited
1st Plaintiff
Harvest Well Industrial Limited
2nd Plaintiff
Ng Shing She
1st Defendant
Prime Centre Limited
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Partition Proceedings Under Partition Ordinance (cap.352) With Related Application Under Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance / Costs Hearing Following Consent Order for Partition; Decision on Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should follow the event where the action was resolved by consent without trial
- 2 Whether any party should be ordered to pay costs up to April 2006 given initial opposition by the 2nd defendant
- 3 Allocation of costs of interlocutory summonses and of the partition order
Ratio Decidendi
Because the partition was ordered by consent without trial or determination on the merits, and the court was not addressed on detailed merits, the court exercised its discretion to make no general order as to costs between the plaintiffs and the 2nd defendant; however, because the plaintiffs prolonged the proceedings after the 2nd defendant had indicated consent in April 2006, the plaintiffs must pay the costs of the plaintiffs' summons and the 2nd defendant's summons, and costs of partition are to be borne proportionally to the parties' shares.
Court Disposition
No general order as to costs between the plaintiffs and the 2nd defendant; plaintiffs to pay costs of the plaintiffs' summons and the 2nd defendant's summons to the 2nd defendant; costs of partition to be borne by the parties in proportion to their shares in the Land.
Orders
- No order as to costs between the plaintiffs and the 2nd defendant.
- The costs of the plaintiffs' summons and the 2nd defendant's summons to be paid by the plaintiffs to the 2nd defendant, to be taxed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment