WONG ARLENE BEI LING AND OTHERS v. PAO ZEN KWOK PETER AND OTHERS
Court ordered sale by public tender only because a follow-on private tender allowing a co-owner to outbid (referential bid) would frustrate competitive bidding and likely reduce the price obtainable; appointed JLL as estate agent (0.35% fee) with specified marketing spend and valuation mechanism (mean of JLL and Knight Frank valuations as reserve price); set terms for viewing, deposit, successive reserve reductions, vacant possession 28 days before completion, distribution proportions and costs to be paid from proceeds.
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 3904
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: WONG ARLENE BEI LING; 2nd Plaintiff: PAO LUN KWOK RAYMOND; 3rd Plaintiff: LAU YUK KUEN (administratrix of the estate of PAO TING SHOU FUN, deceased); 1st Defendant: PAO ZEN KWOK PETER; 2nd Defendant: PAO WAY KWOK DERICK; 3rd Defendant: PAO GEORGE JEI-KWOK
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 31 December 2021
- Case Number
- HCMP1406/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Section 6 Partition Ordinance for Order for Sale / Judgment (substantive Hearing)
- Outcome
- Order for sale by public tender only with detailed ancillary directions as per schedule
- Legal Topics
- Partition, Order for Sale, Mode of Sale, Tender Process, Estate Agent Appointment, Reserve Price Determination, Vacant Possession, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WONG ARLENE BEI LING
1st Plaintiff
PAO LUN KWOK RAYMOND
2nd Plaintiff
LAU YUK KUEN (administratrix of the estate of PAO TING SHOU FUN, deceased)
3rd Plaintiff
PAO ZEN KWOK PETER
1st Defendant
PAO WAY KWOK DERICK
2nd Defendant
PAO GEORGE JEI-KWOK
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 6 Partition Ordinance for Order for Sale / Judgment (substantive Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the property should be sold or partitioned
- 2 Proper mode of sale (public tender only v public followed by private tender)
- 3 Whether referential bids are permissible
Ratio Decidendi
Court ordered sale by public tender only because a follow-on private tender allowing a co-owner to outbid (referential bid) would frustrate competitive bidding and likely reduce the price obtainable; appointed JLL as estate agent (0.35% fee) with specified marketing spend and valuation mechanism (mean of JLL and Knight Frank valuations as reserve price); set terms for viewing, deposit, successive reserve reductions, vacant possession 28 days before completion, distribution proportions and costs to be paid from proceeds.
Court Disposition
Order for sale by public tender only with detailed ancillary directions as per schedule
Orders
- Property to be sold by public tender only
- Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) appointed as estate agent for initial 6 months at fee of 0.35% of final price and to spend at least HK$147,200 on marketing to be borne by JLL
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment