WONG KWOK KI STEPHEN as the joint and several trustee of the property of WONG KIN KEUNG AND ANOTHER v. WONG KIN KEUNG AND ANOTHER
The plaintiffs, as trustees whose legal interest is vested in them, have the basic right to seek sale under the Partition Ordinance and the defendants' complaints about administration are irrelevant to the statutory test for sale; such complaints are properly pursued under the Bankruptcy Ordinance supervisory jurisdiction, therefore the underlined parts of the defence and counterclaim are irrelevant and must be struck out.
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 178
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff (joint and Several Trustee of the Property of WONG KIN Keung): WONG KWOK KI STEPHEN; 2nd Plaintiff (joint and Several Trustee of the Property of WONG KIN Keung): KWAN MEI SEE MACY; 1st Defendant: WONG KIN KEUNG; 2nd Defendant: CHOW CHUI WA CLAUDIA
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2018
- Case Number
- HCA594/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action for Partition and Sale (partition Ordinance) Involving Trustees of Bankrupt's Property / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Parts of Defence and Counterclaim
- Outcome
- Master ordered that the underlined paragraphs and words of the Defence and Counterclaim be struck out as irrelevant; costs reserved for submission.
- Legal Topics
- Partition Ordinance Section 2(c), Order for Sale, Irrelevant Pleadings/strike Out, Supervisory Jurisdiction of Bankruptcy Trustees (ss83, 97), Administration of Bankrupt's Estate
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WONG KWOK KI STEPHEN
1st Plaintiff (joint and Several Trustee of the Property of WONG KIN Keung)
KWAN MEI SEE MACY
2nd Plaintiff (joint and Several Trustee of the Property of WONG KIN Keung)
WONG KIN KEUNG
1st Defendant
CHOW CHUI WA CLAUDIA
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Partition and Sale (partition Ordinance) Involving Trustees of Bankrupt's Property / Interlocutory Application to Strike Out Parts of Defence and Counterclaim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether parts of the defence and counterclaim are irrelevant and liable to be struck out
- 2 Whether the court should refuse an order for sale under section 2(c) of the Partition Ordinance on grounds of benefit or very great hardship
- 3 Whether complaints about trustees' administration are relevant to a partition/sale application and whether they must be pursued by bankruptcy supervisory procedures
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs, as trustees whose legal interest is vested in them, have the basic right to seek sale under the Partition Ordinance and the defendants' complaints about administration are irrelevant to the statutory test for sale; such complaints are properly pursued under the Bankruptcy Ordinance supervisory jurisdiction, therefore the underlined parts of the defence and counterclaim are irrelevant and must be struck out.
Court Disposition
Master ordered that the underlined paragraphs and words of the Defence and Counterclaim be struck out as irrelevant; costs reserved for submission.
Orders
- Paragraphs and words of the Defence and Counterclaim as underlined in the copy annexed to the plaintiffs' summons dated 21 September 2017 are struck out
- Hearing to be listed for submissions on costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment