LI LAI YUEN, the committee of the estate of TMF, a mentally incapacitated person (pursuant to the Order of The Hon Madam Justice B. Chu made on 6 September 2021 under Part II of the Mental Health Ordinance, Cap.136), being the Administratrix of the estate of Li Chik Ming, Deceased v. LI KIM FEI AND OTHERS
Because the defendants failed to comply with an unless order and their Amended Defence was struck out, and because documents were properly served and the amended pleading on its face entitled the plaintiff to the relief sought (with specified textual updates), the court was justified in granting default judgment in the terms proposed by the plaintiff.
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 2514
- Parties
- Plaintiff (committee of Tmf; Administratrix of Estate of Li Chik Ming, Deceased): LI LAI YUEN; 1st Defendant: LI KIM FEI; 2nd Defendant: LI CHI FAI; 3rd Defendant: ALL OCCUPIERS OF SECTION A OF LOT NO.1762 AND SECTION E OF LOT NO.1769 BOTH IN DEMARCATION DISTRICT NO.124
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 September 2024
- Case Number
- HCA1125/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action for Possession, Account and Restitution Arising From Estate Administration / Default Judgment Application Following Striking Out of Amended Defence for Non Compliance With Unless Order
- Outcome
- Default judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff as updated in terms
- Legal Topics
- Possession, Account and Inquiry, Unjust Enrichment, Injunction, Default Judgment, Case Management Non Compliance
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LI LAI YUEN
Plaintiff (committee of Tmf; Administratrix of Estate of Li Chik Ming, Deceased)
LI KIM FEI
1st Defendant
LI CHI FAI
2nd Defendant
ALL OCCUPIERS OF SECTION A OF LOT NO.1762 AND SECTION E OF LOT NO.1769 BOTH IN DEMARCATION DISTRICT NO.124
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Possession, Account and Restitution Arising From Estate Administration / Default Judgment Application Following Striking Out of Amended Defence for Non Compliance With Unless Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff as committee/administratrix is entitled to possession of estate properties
- 2 Whether defendants' amended defence should be struck out for failure to comply with case management order
- 3 Whether default judgment should be entered and relief granted on the face of the pleading
Ratio Decidendi
Because the defendants failed to comply with an unless order and their Amended Defence was struck out, and because documents were properly served and the amended pleading on its face entitled the plaintiff to the relief sought (with specified textual updates), the court was justified in granting default judgment in the terms proposed by the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
Default judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff as updated in terms
Orders
- Amended Defence of 1st and 2nd Defendants struck out for failure to comply with the unless order
- Default judgment entered against the 1st and 2nd Defendants in terms as updated
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment