MAN CHAN WING also known as CHAN WING MAN AND OTHERS v. CHEUNG HING WO AND ANOTHER
The court found credible evidence that the Land was let to the defendant's father (Cheung) and that the defendant failed to prove adverse possession since 1994; the defendant's contention of long non-payment of rent was unpleaded and unsupported and was disallowed; accordingly the plaintiffs were entitled to judgment for vacant possession and damages for trespass and the defendant's counterclaim for possessory title was dismissed.
- Citation
- MAN CHAN WING also known as CHAN WING MAN AND OTHERS v. CHEUNG HING WO AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: MAN CHAN WING (文燦榮) also known as CHAN WING MAN; 2nd Plaintiff: MAN CHAN WAH (文燦華) also known as CHAN WAH MAN; 3rd Plaintiff: MAN CHAN YING (文燦英) also known as CHAN YING MAN; 1st Defendant: CHEUNG HING WO (張慶和); 2nd Defendant: PERSON UNKNOWN in occupation of Lot Nos. 630, 631, 632 and 634 all in Demarcation District No. 105, Yuen Long, New Territories, Hong Kong
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2015
- Case Number
- HCMP1129/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Possession Claim (land) / Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiffs; counterclaim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Possessory Title, Vacant Possession, Trespass, Damages, Termination of Tenancy, Evidence and Witness Credibility, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MAN CHAN WING (文燦榮) also known as CHAN WING MAN
1st Plaintiff
MAN CHAN WAH (文燦華) also known as CHAN WAH MAN
2nd Plaintiff
MAN CHAN YING (文燦英) also known as CHAN YING MAN
3rd Plaintiff
CHEUNG HING WO (張慶和)
1st Defendant
PERSON UNKNOWN in occupation of Lot Nos. 630, 631, 632 and 634 all in Demarcation District No. 105, Yuen Long, New Territories, Hong Kong
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Possession Claim (land) / Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a tenancy of the Land to Cheung or to defendant's family
- 2 Whether defendant established adverse possession since about 1994
- 3 Whether non-payment of rent terminated any periodic tenancy
Ratio Decidendi
The court found credible evidence that the Land was let to the defendant's father (Cheung) and that the defendant failed to prove adverse possession since 1994; the defendant's contention of long non-payment of rent was unpleaded and unsupported and was disallowed; accordingly the plaintiffs were entitled to judgment for vacant possession and damages for trespass and the defendant's counterclaim for possessory title was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiffs; counterclaim dismissed.
Orders
- Order for vacant possession of Lot Nos 630, 631, 632 and 634 in Demarcation District No. 105, Yuen Long, New Territories, Hong Kong to plaintiffs
- Damages for trespass awarded at HK$1,500 per annum payable from 7 March 2013 until delivery of vacant possession
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment