RE SO KIU FAN

RE SO KIU FAN

The application raised unresolved questions of construction and proper exercise of the Feb 2005 receivership order — specifically whether the receiver has authority to appoint permanent directors absent shareholders or a grant of representation, whether the receivership should have ended once the beneficiary attained majority and a personal representative could transfer shares, and whether the receiver has fulfilled his duty to render accounts — and for those reasons the court adjourned the application sine die with liberty to restore to allow the receiver to address these matters.

Citation
RE SO KIU FAN
Parties
Applicant (receiver): So Kiu Fan; Subject Company / Respondent: Hing-F Sports Company Limited; Original Applicant (2005): Madam So; Beneficiary: Lau; Deceased Members: Deceased couple (former shareholders/directors)
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
6 December 2013
Case Number
HCMP242/2005
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 21 L High Court Ordinance (appointment/removal of Receiver / Company Management) / Chambers Hearing — Adjourned Sine Die With Liberty to Restore; Reasons for Adjournment Delivered
Outcome
Application adjourned sine die with liberty to restore
Legal Topics
Powers of a Receiver, Appointment and Removal of Directors, Grant of Representation and Transfer of Shares, Court Ordered General Meetings, Duty of Receiver to Render Accounts
Source Language
EN
Company Law Insolvency/receivership Probate and Administration Powers of a Receiver Appointment and Removal of Directors Grant of Representation and Transfer of Shares Court Ordered General Meetings Duty of Receiver to Render Accounts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

So Kiu Fan

Applicant (receiver)

Hing-F Sports Company Limited

Subject Company / Respondent

Madam So

Original Applicant (2005)

Lau

Beneficiary

Deceased couple (former shareholders/directors)

Deceased Members

Procedural Posture

Application Under Section 21 L High Court Ordinance (appointment/removal of Receiver / Company Management) / Chambers Hearing — Adjourned Sine Die With Liberty to Restore; Reasons for Adjournment Delivered

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Construction and scope of the Feb 2005 receivership order
  2. 2 Whether the receiver has properly exercised the powers conferred by the order
  3. 3 Whether the receiver may appoint permanent directors in circumstances where there is no shareholder or board

Ratio Decidendi

The application raised unresolved questions of construction and proper exercise of the Feb 2005 receivership order — specifically whether the receiver has authority to appoint permanent directors absent shareholders or a grant of representation, whether the receivership should have ended once the beneficiary attained majority and a personal representative could transfer shares, and whether the receiver has fulfilled his duty to render accounts — and for those reasons the court adjourned the application sine die with liberty to restore to allow the receiver to address these matters.

Court Disposition

Application adjourned sine die with liberty to restore

Orders

  • Adjourned sine die with liberty to restore