THE QUEEN v. HO SIU KEUNG
There is no statutory right to a final address at the close of evidence in a magistrates' court; the magistrate's concise statement that the defence explanation was not convincing sufficed to show the presumption under s.19 was not rebutted, so the conviction was properly upheld.
- Citation
- THE QUEEN v. HO SIU KEUNG
- Parties
- Prosecution: THE QUEEN; Appellant/defendant: HO SIU-KEUNG
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 1986
- Case Number
- HCMA1070/1986
- Procedural Posture
- Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Judgment on Appeal to the Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Presumption Under Gambling Ordinance S.19, Rebuttal of Presumption, Right to Address Magistrate, Sufficiency of Reasons, Unsafe Conviction
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE QUEEN
Prosecution
HO SIU-KEUNG
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Judgment on Appeal to the Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the presumption under s.19 of the Gambling Ordinance was properly rebutted
- 2 Whether a defendant has a statutory right to address the magistrate at the close of the evidence
- 3 Whether absence of extensive reasons or of a final speech rendered the conviction unsafe
Ratio Decidendi
There is no statutory right to a final address at the close of evidence in a magistrates' court; the magistrate's concise statement that the defence explanation was not convincing sufficed to show the presumption under s.19 was not rebutted, so the conviction was properly upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment