ALAN CHUNG WAH TANG AND ANOTHER v. LEE SIU FONG AND ANOTHER
The court ordered the private examination of the two Sisters under s29 because the trustees demonstrated a reasonable requirement and prima facie possession of relevant information concerning offshore nominee accounts (including the HK$11 million transfer), certain SFPH share transactions (subject to specified limits), the Sisters' limited involvement in BSW/Dubois Beijing matters, and the Sisters' provision of funds for the bankrupt's living; to avoid oppression the examination scope is limited to transfers or payments equal to or over HK$100,000 (or equivalent) from 1996 onwards, excludes inquiry into the Triumph Leader Ltd to Dynamic Achieve transfer of 1.6 million shares (July 2000),...
- Citation
- ALAN CHUNG WAH TANG AND ANOTHER v. LEE SIU FONG AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Applicant (joint and Several Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Property of the Bankrupt): Alan Chung Wah Tang; Applicant (joint and Several Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Property of the Bankrupt): Hou Chung Man; 1st Respondent: Lee Siu Fong; 2nd Respondent: Leelalertsuphakun Wanee
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2017
- Case Number
- HCB345/2001
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Proceedings (private Examination Application) / Judgment on Trustees' Application for Examination Under S29 Bankruptcy Ordinance
- Outcome
- Order granted for private examination of 1st and 2nd Respondents (the Sisters) under s29 Bankruptcy Ordinance, subject to limitations on scope and period.
- Legal Topics
- Private Examination Under S29, Nominee/secret Accounts, Undervalue Transfers and Share Transactions, Recovery of Trust Property, Limitation Issues, Oppression/balancing Exercise
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Chung Wah Tang
Applicant (joint and Several Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Property of the Bankrupt)
Hou Chung Man
Applicant (joint and Several Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Property of the Bankrupt)
Lee Siu Fong
1st Respondent
Leelalertsuphakun Wanee
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Proceedings (private Examination Application) / Judgment on Trustees' Application for Examination Under S29 Bankruptcy Ordinance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trustees have a reasonable requirement to examine the Sisters under s29 for information about nominee offshore accounts and transfers
- 2 Whether examination should extend to SFPH share dealings and related corporate transactions
- 3 Whether examination should cover transfers to the Sisters (including HK$11 million) and other funding of the bankrupt's living expenses
Ratio Decidendi
The court ordered the private examination of the two Sisters under s29 because the trustees demonstrated a reasonable requirement and prima facie possession of relevant information concerning offshore nominee accounts (including the HK$11 million transfer), certain SFPH share transactions (subject to specified limits), the Sisters' limited involvement in BSW/Dubois Beijing matters, and the Sisters' provision of funds for the bankrupt's living; to avoid oppression the examination scope is limited to transfers or payments equal to or over HK$100,000 (or equivalent) from 1996 onwards, excludes inquiry into the Triumph Leader Ltd to Dynamic Achieve transfer of 1.6 million shares (July 2000),...
Court Disposition
Order granted for private examination of 1st and 2nd Respondents (the Sisters) under s29 Bankruptcy Ordinance, subject to limitations on scope and period.
Orders
- Private examination of the 1st and 2nd Respondents to take place before a Master of the High Court
- Examination limited to inquiries about nominee/undisclosed accounts, transfers and payments of HK$100,000 or more (or equivalent) from 1996 onwards
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment