RE FIVE LAKES INVESTMENT CO LTD
Because Gala Land established a credible prima facie case under the just and equitable provision (loss of mutual trust, deadlock, alleged payments to interests of the other director and obstruction to inspection) and the companies' affairs were paralysed with risk to assets and management, the court was justified in appointing provisional liquidators to protect the companies pending the hearing; consequently the section 182 application was dismissed as unnecessary.
- Citation
- RE FIVE LAKES INVESTMENT CO LTD
- Parties
- Petitioner: Gala Land Investment Company Ltd.; Opposing Contributory / Respondent: Octaland Holdings (H.K.) Ltd.; Company (subject of Winding Up Petition): Five Lakes Investment Company Limited; Company (subject of Winding Up Petition): Multiford Company Limited; Intervener / Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 1983
- Case Number
- HCCW79/1983
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) Petition / Interlocutory Hearing on Appointment of Provisional Liquidator and Section 182 Application
- Outcome
- Provisional liquidators appointed for Five Lakes Investment Company Limited and Multiford Company Limited; application under section 182 dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Provisional Liquidator Appointment, Winding Up Petition (just and Equitable Ground), Directors Duties and Inspection of Books, Section 182 Exoneration of Dispositions, Deadlock Between Directors
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gala Land Investment Company Ltd.
Petitioner
Octaland Holdings (H.K.) Ltd.
Opposing Contributory / Respondent
Five Lakes Investment Company Limited
Company (subject of Winding Up Petition)
Multiford Company Limited
Company (subject of Winding Up Petition)
Official Receiver
Intervener / Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Petition / Interlocutory Hearing on Appointment of Provisional Liquidator and Section 182 Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether petitioner established a prima facie case for winding-up under the just and equitable provision
- 2 Whether circumstances justify appointment of provisional liquidator under section 193
- 3 Whether application under section 182 to authorise management outgoings should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
Because Gala Land established a credible prima facie case under the just and equitable provision (loss of mutual trust, deadlock, alleged payments to interests of the other director and obstruction to inspection) and the companies' affairs were paralysed with risk to assets and management, the court was justified in appointing provisional liquidators to protect the companies pending the hearing; consequently the section 182 application was dismissed as unnecessary.
Court Disposition
Provisional liquidators appointed for Five Lakes Investment Company Limited and Multiford Company Limited; application under section 182 dismissed
Orders
- Petitions consolidated for hearing
- Appointment of provisional liquidator for Five Lakes Investment Company Limited pursuant to s193 until determination of petitions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment