HKSAR v. KWOK WING
After inspecting the Documents the court found they were not material or relevant to the stay application and that the public interest in preserving confidential HKP‑UPSM cooperation outweighed the defence interest; consequently the Documents are subject to public interest immunity and must not be disclosed to the defence.
- Citation
- HKSAR v. KWOK WING
- Parties
- Prosecution: HKSAR; Defendant/respondent: Kwok Wing
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2015
- Case Number
- HCCC217/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Pre Trial — Stay of Proceedings Application and Disclosure Application
- Outcome
- Prosecution application to exclude the Documents on grounds of public interest immunity granted
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Immunity, Disclosure, Abuse of Process, Stay of Proceedings, Extradition/deportation, Police Cooperation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HKSAR
Prosecution
Kwok Wing
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial — Stay of Proceedings Application and Disclosure Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Documents are covered by public interest immunity (PII)
- 2 Whether the Documents are relevant/material to the defendant's stay application
- 3 Whether the public interest in confidentiality outweighs the interests of justice
Ratio Decidendi
After inspecting the Documents the court found they were not material or relevant to the stay application and that the public interest in preserving confidential HKP‑UPSM cooperation outweighed the defence interest; consequently the Documents are subject to public interest immunity and must not be disclosed to the defence.
Court Disposition
Prosecution application to exclude the Documents on grounds of public interest immunity granted
Orders
- The Documents are subject to public interest immunity and are not to be disclosed to the defence
- No blanket prohibition is made restraining the defence from seeking information as to the identities of UPSM officers; any application in that regard may be considered at the stay proceedings or when such evidence is sought from HKP witnesses
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment