WILLWIN DEVELOPMENT (ASIA) CO LTD v. WEI XING AND OTHERS
On the balance of probabilities R1 did not fully comply with paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Anton Piller Order in respect of Listed Items 2, 3 and 4; his affirmation was evasive and the apology insincere because it denied or ignored the court's factual findings and failed to disclose or explain outstanding documents and transactions; having given R1 the prior opportunity to purge and having regard to the court's discretion under Re W(B), the suspended 28-day custodial sentence is activated and costs are awarded on an indemnity basis.
- Citation
- WILLWIN DEVELOPMENT (ASIA) CO LTD v. WEI XING AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Applicant (1st Plaintiff): WILLWIN DEVELOPMENT (ASIA) COMPANY LIMITED; 1st Respondent (1st Defendant): WEI XING; 2nd Respondent (2nd Defendant): EVOLUTION SOLUTION LIMITED; 3rd Respondent (3rd Defendant): HU YING
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2016
- Case Number
- HCMP2946/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Committal and Writ of Sequestration Arising From Alleged Contempt of Injunctions and Anton Piller Order / Enforcement/activation Hearing of Suspended Committal Sentence After Judgment and Penalty Stages
- Outcome
- Suspended committal sentence activated; R1 imprisoned for 28 days; costs ordered against R1 on indemnity basis.
- Legal Topics
- Purging Contempt, Suspended Committal Orders, Disclosure Obligations Under Anton Piller, Standard of Proof in Civil Contempt, Exercise of Judicial Discretion on Activation of Sentence, Insincerity of Apology
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WILLWIN DEVELOPMENT (ASIA) COMPANY LIMITED
Applicant (1st Plaintiff)
WEI XING
1st Respondent (1st Defendant)
EVOLUTION SOLUTION LIMITED
2nd Respondent (2nd Defendant)
HU YING
3rd Respondent (3rd Defendant)
Procedural Posture
Application for Committal and Writ of Sequestration Arising From Alleged Contempt of Injunctions and Anton Piller Order / Enforcement/activation Hearing of Suspended Committal Sentence After Judgment and Penalty Stages
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether R1 has purged his contempt by filing affirmation WX3-2946 and complied with the Condition of suspension
- 2 Whether R1 breached paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Anton Piller Order in respect of Listed Items 2,3 and 4
- 3 Whether it is just to activate the suspended 28-day custodial sentence despite any partial compliance and apology
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities R1 did not fully comply with paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Anton Piller Order in respect of Listed Items 2, 3 and 4; his affirmation was evasive and the apology insincere because it denied or ignored the court's factual findings and failed to disclose or explain outstanding documents and transactions; having given R1 the prior opportunity to purge and having regard to the court's discretion under Re W(B), the suspended 28-day custodial sentence is activated and costs are awarded on an indemnity basis.
Court Disposition
Suspended committal sentence activated; R1 imprisoned for 28 days; costs ordered against R1 on indemnity basis.
Orders
- Activate 28-day custodial sentence against R1 (Wei Xing)
- Costs of this application to be paid by R1 on an indemnity basis
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment