張才奎所託管中國山水投資有限公司股份 AND ANOTHER v. 張才奎 AND ANOTHER
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the court was entitled to extend receivers' powers in light of materially deteriorated circumstances to preserve trust assets; the 1st defendant's application was repetitive, obstructive and an abuse of process, and there was no convincing prospect that further affirmation evidence would alter that conclusion; accordingly leave was refused and indemnity costs awarded to the other parties.
- Citation
- 張才奎所託管中國山水投資有限公司股份 AND ANOTHER v. 張才奎 AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: 1st Group Plaintiffs (employees whose China Shanshui Investment Co Ltd shares were held by Zhang Caikui on trust); Plaintiffs: 2nd Group Plaintiffs (employees whose China Shanshui Investment Co Ltd shares were held by Li Yanmin on trust); 1st Defendant: Zhang Caikui; 2nd Defendant: Li Yanmin; Court‑appointed Receivers: Receivers
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2015
- Case Number
- HCA1564/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Shareholder Dispute Interlocutory Receivership and Applications for Leave to Appeal / Chambers Decision on Second Application for Leave to Appeal and Receivers' Summons (interlocutory)
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed; application found misconceived, abusive and a waste of time and costs; indemnity costs awarded against the 1st defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Receivership Powers, Preservation of Assets, Abuse of Process, Leave to Appeal, Interim Relief, Vexatious Interlocutory Litigation, Indemnity Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
1st Group Plaintiffs (employees whose China Shanshui Investment Co Ltd shares were held by Zhang Caikui on trust)
Plaintiffs
2nd Group Plaintiffs (employees whose China Shanshui Investment Co Ltd shares were held by Li Yanmin on trust)
Plaintiffs
Zhang Caikui
1st Defendant
Li Yanmin
2nd Defendant
Receivers
Court‑appointed Receivers
Procedural Posture
Shareholder Dispute Interlocutory Receivership and Applications for Leave to Appeal / Chambers Decision on Second Application for Leave to Appeal and Receivers' Summons (interlocutory)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether court could extend receivers' powers notwithstanding a previous judge's direction limiting receivers from altering board composition
- 2 Whether the 1st defendant should be permitted to file further affirmation evidence
- 3 Whether the application for leave to appeal was an abuse of process and should be dismissed
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the court was entitled to extend receivers' powers in light of materially deteriorated circumstances to preserve trust assets; the 1st defendant's application was repetitive, obstructive and an abuse of process, and there was no convincing prospect that further affirmation evidence would alter that conclusion; accordingly leave was refused and indemnity costs awarded to the other parties.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed; application found misconceived, abusive and a waste of time and costs; indemnity costs awarded against the 1st defendant.
Orders
- Application dismissed
- Application entirely misconceived
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment