RE HUSK\'S GREEN TECHNOLOGY HOLDING CO LTD (in liquidation)
The court found that the Re Trinity requirements were met: the Company is in creditors' voluntary liquidation, the applicant is the liquidator, the request was to a Mainland court with jurisdiction over four Xiamen subsidiaries, and the proposed letter of request properly described the duties and assistance sought; the court exercised its discretion to approve and direct issuance of the letter of request to the Xiamen Court to recognize the liquidation and enable the liquidator to take control of the subsidiaries and pursue necessary measures.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 3054
- Parties
- Petitioner and Appointed Liquidator (appears in Person): Lee Chan Kok; Company (in Liquidation): Husk’s Green Technology Holding Co., Limited (殼氏環保科技集團有限公司); Provisional Liquidators (huens): Huen Ho Yin and Huen Yuen Fun
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2023
- Case Number
- HCCW43/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) Proceedings / Interlocutory Application for Issuance of Letter of Request Under the Hong Kong–mainland Cooperation Mechanism (chambers Application)
- Outcome
- Summons restored and granted insofar as the court approved and directed the issuance of a letter of request to the Xiamen Intermediate People’s Court recognising the creditors' voluntary winding up and requesting assistance to enable the liquidator to take control of the four Xiamen subsidiaries; directions given...
- Legal Topics
- Recognition and Assistance Under Cooperation Mechanism, Letters of Request/letters Rogatory, Liquidator Powers and Duties, Conversion to Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation, Jurisdictional Cooperation With Mainland Courts
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lee Chan Kok
Petitioner and Appointed Liquidator (appears in Person)
Husk’s Green Technology Holding Co., Limited (殼氏環保科技集團有限公司)
Company (in Liquidation)
Huen Ho Yin and Huen Yuen Fun
Provisional Liquidators (huens)
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Proceedings / Interlocutory Application for Issuance of Letter of Request Under the Hong Kong–mainland Cooperation Mechanism (chambers Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant had locus to apply for recognition and assistance under the Cooperation Mechanism
- 2 Whether the statutory and procedural requirements (as in Re Trinity) for issuing a letter of request to a Mainland court were satisfied
- 3 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to request the Xiamen Court to recognize the liquidation and grant assistance to the liquidator
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Re Trinity requirements were met: the Company is in creditors' voluntary liquidation, the applicant is the liquidator, the request was to a Mainland court with jurisdiction over four Xiamen subsidiaries, and the proposed letter of request properly described the duties and assistance sought; the court exercised its discretion to approve and direct issuance of the letter of request to the Xiamen Court to recognize the liquidation and enable the liquidator to take control of the subsidiaries and pursue necessary measures.
Court Disposition
Summons restored and granted insofar as the court approved and directed the issuance of a letter of request to the Xiamen Intermediate People’s Court recognising the creditors' voluntary winding up and requesting assistance to enable the liquidator to take control of the four Xiamen subsidiaries; directions given...
Orders
- The court approved the revised letter of request (Appendix A) and directed the liquidator to lodge it with the Registrar of the High Court within 7 days for the Registrar to sign the same
- The signed letter of request will be returned to the liquidator for inclusion in materials to be submitted to the Xiamen Intermediate People’s Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment