RE CAPITAL SINO INVESTMENTS LTD
The originating summons was adjourned sine die because the mortgagee bank, a party to the instrument sought to be rectified, had not been joined or served and there was no evidence of its consent; section 347 allows rectification subject to common law and equitable principles, and procedural fairness requires joining parties to the instrument before making a rectification order.
- Citation
- RE CAPITAL SINO INVESTMENTS LTD
- Parties
- Mortgagor/applicant: Applicant company; Mortgagee/respondent: Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited; Registrar: Registrar of Companies
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 January 2015
- Case Number
- HCMP2939/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Rectification of Documents Relating to Registration of Charges Under Section 347 Companies Ordinance (cap 622) / Ex Parte Originating Summons Filed; Hearing Adjourned Sine Die With Liberty to Restore
- Outcome
- Hearing adjourned sine die with liberty to restore due to procedural defect (bank not joined/served)
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Instruments, Registration of Charges, Section 347 Companies Ordinance, Joinder of Parties
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant company
Mortgagor/applicant
Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited
Mortgagee/respondent
Registrar of Companies
Registrar
Procedural Posture
Rectification of Documents Relating to Registration of Charges Under Section 347 Companies Ordinance (cap 622) / Ex Parte Originating Summons Filed; Hearing Adjourned Sine Die With Liberty to Restore
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 347 permits rectification of the original instrument as opposed to only the certified copy delivered for registration
- 2 Whether rectification under section 347 is subject to common law and equitable principles
- 3 Whether parties to the instrument (including the mortgagee bank) must be joined and served before the court may make a rectification order
Ratio Decidendi
The originating summons was adjourned sine die because the mortgagee bank, a party to the instrument sought to be rectified, had not been joined or served and there was no evidence of its consent; section 347 allows rectification subject to common law and equitable principles, and procedural fairness requires joining parties to the instrument before making a rectification order.
Court Disposition
Hearing adjourned sine die with liberty to restore due to procedural defect (bank not joined/served)
Orders
- Originating summons adjourned sine die with liberty to restore
- Liberty to restore so the applicant may join and serve the mortgagee bank and remedy the procedural defect before further hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment