GREATMAX INTERNATIONAL LTD AND OTHERS v. LO SHA KAM HA TERESA AND OTHERS
On the statutory test in s4(2) the Tribunal accepted the applicants met prerequisites and proved redevelopment justified by both age and state of repair on expert evidence, applicants took reasonable steps to purchase minority shares with offers within a fair and reasonable band, alleged undue hardship is not a statutory bar and was not established as undue, the Tribunal determined EUV at HKD536,510,000 and RDV/reserve price at HKD1,000,000,000 and therefore granted an order for sale with conditions.
- Citation
- [2023] HKLdT 47
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: GREATMAX INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (益明國際有限公司); 2nd Applicant: LUCKY GAIN HOLDINGS LIMITED (利裕集團有限公司); 3rd Applicant: GOLD DYNAMIC DEVELOPMENT LIMITED (帝港發展有限公司); 1st Respondent: LO SHA KAM HA TERESA (盧佘錦霞); 2nd Respondent: CHEUK KAY LIMITED (卓基有限公司); 3rd Respondent: TSANG YIN SANG (曾賢生); 4th Respondents: LEE HO YEE WILSON, THE SOLE EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF LEE SHUN KEI, DECEASED AND LEE WAI YEE JUDY; 5th Respondent (discontinued): LORETTA LUI (雷嘉嫻); 6th Respondent (discontinued): LUI KING HANG (呂敬行), ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF TSANG CHANG HING (曾振興) ALIAS SO HING, DECEASED (蘇興); 7th Respondent (discontinued): EAGLE LORD LIMITED (鷹皇有限公司)
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2023
- Case Number
- LDCS7000/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance (cap 545) for Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment / Post Trial Judgment (order for Sale Granted)
- Outcome
- Order for sale granted for redevelopment; trustees appointed; reserve price set; costs ordered nisi in favour of respondents
- Legal Topics
- Redevelopment Justification, Age and State of Repair, Reasonable Steps to Acquire Minority Shares, Undue Hardship on Minority Owners, Existing Use Value (euv) Determination, Redevelopment Value (rdv) and Reserve Price, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GREATMAX INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (益明國際有限公司)
1st Applicant
LUCKY GAIN HOLDINGS LIMITED (利裕集團有限公司)
2nd Applicant
GOLD DYNAMIC DEVELOPMENT LIMITED (帝港發展有限公司)
3rd Applicant
LO SHA KAM HA TERESA (盧佘錦霞)
1st Respondent
CHEUK KAY LIMITED (卓基有限公司)
2nd Respondent
TSANG YIN SANG (曾賢生)
3rd Respondent
LEE HO YEE WILSON, THE SOLE EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF LEE SHUN KEI, DECEASED AND LEE WAI YEE JUDY
4th Respondents
LORETTA LUI (雷嘉嫻)
5th Respondent (discontinued)
LUI KING HANG (呂敬行), ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF TSANG CHANG HING (曾振興) ALIAS SO HING, DECEASED (蘇興)
6th Respondent (discontinued)
EAGLE LORD LIMITED (鷹皇有限公司)
7th Respondent (discontinued)
Procedural Posture
Application Under Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance (cap 545) for Compulsory Sale for Redevelopment / Post Trial Judgment (order for Sale Granted)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicants met statutory prerequisites to bring the application under s3
- 2 Whether redevelopment justified by age or state of repair under s4(2)(a)
- 3 Whether applicants took reasonable steps to acquire minority undivided shares under s4(2)(b)
Ratio Decidendi
On the statutory test in s4(2) the Tribunal accepted the applicants met prerequisites and proved redevelopment justified by both age and state of repair on expert evidence, applicants took reasonable steps to purchase minority shares with offers within a fair and reasonable band, alleged undue hardship is not a statutory bar and was not established as undue, the Tribunal determined EUV at HKD536,510,000 and RDV/reserve price at HKD1,000,000,000 and therefore granted an order for sale with conditions.
Court Disposition
Order for sale granted for redevelopment; trustees appointed; reserve price set; costs ordered nisi in favour of respondents
Orders
- All undivided shares in the Lots to be sold by public auction for redevelopment purposes
- Mr Tam Tak Hing and Mr Ching Kwok Ho appointed trustees to discharge duties under the Ordinance
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment