RE BACK IN TIME LTD

RE BACK IN TIME LTD

The court confirmed the reduction because statutory procedures were complied with, the reduction had a legitimate commercial purpose, the company remained solvent with net assets exceeding liabilities even on conservative valuation, and creditors would not be prejudiced; therefore confirmation under s.59 was appropriate.

Citation
RE BACK IN TIME LTD
Parties
Petitioner: Back In Time Limited
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
17 March 2009
Case Number
HCMP196/2009
Procedural Posture
Companies Ordinance Petition for Reduction of Share Capital (s.59) / Judgment/confirmation of Reduction of Share Capital
Outcome
Petition granted; reduction of share capital confirmed.
Legal Topics
Reduction of Share Capital, Capital Maintenance, Shareholder Restructuring, Creditor Protection, Valuation of Intangible Assets
Source Language
EN
Company Law Corporate Finance Insolvency and Creditors Reduction of Share Capital Capital Maintenance Shareholder Restructuring Creditor Protection Valuation of Intangible Assets

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Back In Time Limited

Petitioner

Procedural Posture

Companies Ordinance Petition for Reduction of Share Capital (s.59) / Judgment/confirmation of Reduction of Share Capital

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court should confirm a statutory reduction of share capital under s.59 Companies Ordinance
  2. 2 Whether creditors would be prejudiced by the proposed reduction
  3. 3 Whether statutory procedures (special resolution, advertisement, directions) were complied with

Ratio Decidendi

The court confirmed the reduction because statutory procedures were complied with, the reduction had a legitimate commercial purpose, the company remained solvent with net assets exceeding liabilities even on conservative valuation, and creditors would not be prejudiced; therefore confirmation under s.59 was appropriate.

Court Disposition

Petition granted; reduction of share capital confirmed.

Orders

  • Order confirming reduction of authorised share capital from US$50,000,000 (50,000 ordinary shares of US$1,000 each) to US$28,582,000 (28,582 ordinary shares of US$1,000 each)
  • Order confirming reduction of issued share capital from US$49,250,000 (49,250 ordinary shares) to US$28,582,000 (28,582 ordinary shares)