WONG PUI YIN GEORGEANNA (as the administratrix of the estate of WONG CECILIA PUI LUEN, deceased) v. ELITE GIANT LTD AND ANOTHER
The court dismissed the intervener's application for a stay because his evidence was insufficient to justify leaving the companies without functioning boards, he was largely the author of his own predicament by failing to document any trust or declaration, and the plaintiff offered undertakings; accordingly the orders sought by the plaintiff to register her as shareholder and to convene general meetings were granted and the stay refused.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 1663
- Parties
- Plaintiff (administratrix): WONG PUI YIN GEORGEANNA; Defendant (hcmp 800/2022): HIROSHI TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED; 1st Defendant (hcmp 801/2022): CHEER CREATION LIMITED; 2nd Defendant (hcmp 801/2022 & HCMP 802/2022): e-CORPORATE SERVICE LIMITED; 1st Defendant (hcmp 802/2022): ELITE GIANT LIMITED; Intervener: LEE CHI WANG
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2023
- Case Number
- HCMP802/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summonses (companies Matters) / Judgment on Originating Summonses and Inter Partes Summons to Intervene/stay
- Outcome
- Intervener's application for a stay dismissed; originating summonses granted in favour of the plaintiff; order nisi as to costs of the inter partes summons against the intervener.
- Legal Topics
- Registration of Shareholders, Reconstitution of Company Boards, Intervention and Stay of Proceedings, Orders Under Companies Ordinance Ss.158, 159, 570, 633
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WONG PUI YIN GEORGEANNA
Plaintiff (administratrix)
HIROSHI TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Defendant (hcmp 800/2022)
CHEER CREATION LIMITED
1st Defendant (hcmp 801/2022)
e-CORPORATE SERVICE LIMITED
2nd Defendant (hcmp 801/2022 & HCMP 802/2022)
ELITE GIANT LIMITED
1st Defendant (hcmp 802/2022)
LEE CHI WANG
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Originating Summonses (companies Matters) / Judgment on Originating Summonses and Inter Partes Summons to Intervene/stay
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the administratrix should be registered as the shareholder and general meetings convened to reconstitute the boards under the Companies Ordinance
- 2 Whether the intervener's application to intervene and stay the originating summonses should be granted pending determination of a separate action asserting beneficial ownership
- 3 Whether the intervener's evidence is sufficient to justify depriving the companies of functioning boards
Ratio Decidendi
The court dismissed the intervener's application for a stay because his evidence was insufficient to justify leaving the companies without functioning boards, he was largely the author of his own predicament by failing to document any trust or declaration, and the plaintiff offered undertakings; accordingly the orders sought by the plaintiff to register her as shareholder and to convene general meetings were granted and the stay refused.
Court Disposition
Intervener's application for a stay dismissed; originating summonses granted in favour of the plaintiff; order nisi as to costs of the inter partes summons against the intervener.
Orders
- Orders granted under Companies Ordinance ss.158,159,570 and 633 to register the plaintiff as the shareholder of the shares registered in the deceased Cecilia's name for Hiroshi Technologies Limited, Cheer Creation Limited and Elite Giant Limited and to convene general meetings to reconstitute the boards
- Plaintiff's undertakings accepted: not to dispose of assets of Cheer and Elite without leave of the court and not to dispose of assets of Hiroshi other than in the normal course of business
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment