RE HSIN CHONG CONSTRUCTION CO LTD
The application for a regulating order was dismissed because the court was not satisfied it was right to deprive creditors of the statutory opportunity to convene and vote at a first meeting: two significant creditors (HSBC and WKCDA) had legitimate, non‑frivolous objections based on procedural failings by the Provisional Liquidators and prior judicial criticisms; the applicants failed to demonstrate that a remote meeting was considered or infeasible; allowing creditors to canvass and choose liquidators was required in the interests of creditors, so dispensing with the first meeting and appointing liquidators by order was inappropriate.
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 559
- Parties
- Provisional Liquidators / Applicants: Osman Mohammed Arab and Lai Wing Lung; Company (in Liquidation): Hsin Chong Construction Company Limited (In Liquidation); Opposing Creditor / Respondent: West Kowloon Cultural District Authority; Supporting Creditor: AIG Insurance Hong Kong Limited; Opposing Creditor: HSBC; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2021
- Case Number
- HCCW239/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Winding Up Proceedings / Application for Regulating Order; Hearing and Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Regulating Order, Appointment of Liquidators, Committee of Inspection, Dispensing First Creditors Meeting, Remote Meetings/covid 19
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Osman Mohammed Arab and Lai Wing Lung
Provisional Liquidators / Applicants
Hsin Chong Construction Company Limited (In Liquidation)
Company (in Liquidation)
West Kowloon Cultural District Authority
Opposing Creditor / Respondent
AIG Insurance Hong Kong Limited
Supporting Creditor
HSBC
Opposing Creditor
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Companies Winding Up Proceedings / Application for Regulating Order; Hearing and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a regulating order should be made under s227A/B Cap 32
- 2 Whether to dispense with the statutory first meetings and appoint liquidators
- 3 Weight to be given to wishes of creditors including independent creditors
Ratio Decidendi
The application for a regulating order was dismissed because the court was not satisfied it was right to deprive creditors of the statutory opportunity to convene and vote at a first meeting: two significant creditors (HSBC and WKCDA) had legitimate, non‑frivolous objections based on procedural failings by the Provisional Liquidators and prior judicial criticisms; the applicants failed to demonstrate that a remote meeting was considered or infeasible; allowing creditors to canvass and choose liquidators was required in the interests of creditors, so dispensing with the first meeting and appointing liquidators by order was inappropriate.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for regulating order dismissed
- Costs of the application payable out of the assets of the Company by the Provisional Liquidators, the Official Receiver, AIG and WKCDA; costs to be taxed if not agreed and paid forthwith
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment