SHIH CHIA CHEONG, administrator of the Estate of SHIH CHIA YING, deceased v. LI LIU ZHU
The defendant's inconsistent and changing claims over the securities account created a serious conflict of interest with the estate and the minor beneficiary such that, applying s33(3) PAO and having regard to the sizeable estate and the minor's protected statutory interest, the court removed both co-administrators and appointed independent professional administrators (McCabe and Mr Kong) and ordered delivery up of assets and vesting; costs awarded to the plaintiff on an indemnity basis and plaintiff's costs to be paid from the estate.
- Citation
- SHIH CHIA CHEONG, administrator of the Estate of SHIH CHIA YING, deceased v. LI LIU ZHU
- Parties
- Co Administrator of the Estate of Shih Chia Ying (applicant): SHIH CHIA CHEONG; Co Administrator of the Estate of Shih Chia Ying; Beneficiary (defendant): LI LIU ZHU
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 5 November 2012
- Case Number
- HCMP1891/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S33 Probate and Administration Ordinance (estate Administration) / Hearing and Judgment (reasons for Decision) 26 September 2012
- Outcome
- Application allowed: both plaintiff and defendant removed as administrators; McCabe International Trustee Limited and Mr Kong How Chi Johnson appointed as substituted administrators; consequential vesting orders and delivery up of assets ordered; costs awarded to plaintiff on an indemnity basis and plaintiff's costs...
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Administrator, Statutory Trust for Minor, Vesting Orders, Accounts of Administrators, Conflict of Interest
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SHIH CHIA CHEONG
Co Administrator of the Estate of Shih Chia Ying (applicant)
LI LIU ZHU
Co Administrator of the Estate of Shih Chia Ying; Beneficiary (defendant)
Procedural Posture
Application Under S33 Probate and Administration Ordinance (estate Administration) / Hearing and Judgment (reasons for Decision) 26 September 2012
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to remove a co-administrator under s33(3) PAO
- 2 Whether a co-administrator's changed claim over estate assets creates a conflict of interest warranting removal
- 3 Whether professional administrators should be appointed given size of estate and minority beneficiary
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant's inconsistent and changing claims over the securities account created a serious conflict of interest with the estate and the minor beneficiary such that, applying s33(3) PAO and having regard to the sizeable estate and the minor's protected statutory interest, the court removed both co-administrators and appointed independent professional administrators (McCabe and Mr Kong) and ordered delivery up of assets and vesting; costs awarded to the plaintiff on an indemnity basis and plaintiff's costs to be paid from the estate.
Court Disposition
Application allowed: both plaintiff and defendant removed as administrators; McCabe International Trustee Limited and Mr Kong How Chi Johnson appointed as substituted administrators; consequential vesting orders and delivery up of assets ordered; costs awarded to plaintiff on an indemnity basis and plaintiff's costs...
Orders
- Plaintiff and defendant removed as administrators of the estate of Shih Chia Ying and substituted by McCabe International Trustee Limited and Mr Kong How Chi Johnson
- Defendant ordered to provide an account and to deliver up the assets of the estate to the substituted administrators
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment