LIN FEI ZHU, administratrix of the estate of WONG CHING YIN, Deceased v. WONG YAT WAI, administrator of the estate of WONG CHING YIN, Deceased
Both parties achieved only partial success under the settlement; on the existing materials the court could not reliably say which party would have prevailed at trial; delay in disclosure and alleged dissipation by the administratrix did not, without full hearing, justify removal or a costs order against her; allegations of bad faith were arguable but not proven; accordingly the court exercised its discretion to make no order as to costs for both proceedings while ordering Wong's personal costs to be taxed in accordance with the Legal Aid Regulations and creating a costs order nisi for the hearing.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 253
- Parties
- Plaintiff in Hcmp543/2020; Defendant in Hcmp1034/2021: Wong Yat Wai; Defendant in Hcmp543/2020; Plaintiff in Hcmp1034/2021: Lin Fei Zhu
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 February 2023
- Case Number
- HCMP1034/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Proceedings (hcmp) Concerning Estate Administration and Originating Summonses / Decision on Costs After Settlement (costs Hearing Following Substantive Settlement)
- Outcome
- No order as to costs in HCMP543/2020 and HCMP1034/2021; Wong's personal costs to be taxed in accordance with the Legal Aid Regulations; costs order nisi for this hearing that will become absolute unless varied within 14 days.
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Administrator, Disclosure and Accounts by Personal Representatives, Settlement Except Costs, Inheritance (provision for Family and Dependants) Ordinance Claims, Costs Taxation Under Legal Aid Regulations
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wong Yat Wai
Plaintiff in Hcmp543/2020; Defendant in Hcmp1034/2021
Lin Fei Zhu
Defendant in Hcmp543/2020; Plaintiff in Hcmp1034/2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Proceedings (hcmp) Concerning Estate Administration and Originating Summonses / Decision on Costs After Settlement (costs Hearing Following Substantive Settlement)
Legal Issues
- 1 Who should bear costs where substantive proceedings settled except as to costs
- 2 Whether delay in disclosure and alleged dissipation justifies removal of an administrator and adverse costs order
- 3 Whether one party substantially obtained the reliefs claimed such that costs should follow the event
Ratio Decidendi
Both parties achieved only partial success under the settlement; on the existing materials the court could not reliably say which party would have prevailed at trial; delay in disclosure and alleged dissipation by the administratrix did not, without full hearing, justify removal or a costs order against her; allegations of bad faith were arguable but not proven; accordingly the court exercised its discretion to make no order as to costs for both proceedings while ordering Wong's personal costs to be taxed in accordance with the Legal Aid Regulations and creating a costs order nisi for the hearing.
Court Disposition
No order as to costs in HCMP543/2020 and HCMP1034/2021; Wong's personal costs to be taxed in accordance with the Legal Aid Regulations; costs order nisi for this hearing that will become absolute unless varied within 14 days.
Orders
- In HCMP543/2020: no order as to costs; Wong's own costs be taxed in accordance with the Legal Aid Regulations.
- In HCMP1034/2021: no order as to costs; Wong's own costs be taxed in accordance with the Legal Aid Regulations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment