CHAN CHU WA AND ANOTHER v. CHAN CHAU FUNG, the administratrix of the estate of POON SIU CHUN, deceased AND OTHERS
The 1st Defendant was removed because, taking all circumstances holistically, she failed to render a full and proper account when demanded, undisclosed sale proceeds and substantial URA allowances were not accounted for and were largely reinvested into a property registered in the names of beneficiaries (the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 5493
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: CHAN CHU WA; 2nd Plaintiff: CHAN KAM HE; 1st Defendant (administratrix): CHAN CHAU FUNG; 2nd Defendant: CHAN WAI ON EDDIE; 3rd Defendant: CHAN YIN FUN ALICE; Deceased: POON SIU CHUN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2025
- Case Number
- HCMP247/2025
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration — Removal of Administrator (s.33(3) Pao) / Judgment on Originating Summons (final)
- Outcome
- Order removing 1st Defendant as administratrix; appointment of Ms Tse Man Shan, Anna as new administratrix; direction for 1st Defendant to render full and proper account within 21 days; costs nisi personally against 1st Defendant; no order as to damages or costs against 2nd and 3rd Defendants.
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Administrator, Accounting by Administrator, Appointment of Professional Administratrix, Interim Distribution, Costs in Estate Proceedings, Misapplication of Estate Funds
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN CHU WA
1st Plaintiff
CHAN KAM HE
2nd Plaintiff
CHAN CHAU FUNG
1st Defendant (administratrix)
CHAN WAI ON EDDIE
2nd Defendant
CHAN YIN FUN ALICE
3rd Defendant
POON SIU CHUN
Deceased
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration — Removal of Administrator (s.33(3) Pao) / Judgment on Originating Summons (final)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the administratrix should be removed under s.33(3) PAO for failure to administer the estate properly
- 2 Whether the administratrix failed to render a full and proper account when demanded
- 3 Whether sale proceeds and URA allowances were properly dealt with and whether reinvestment into a property constituted misappropriation
Ratio Decidendi
The 1st Defendant was removed because, taking all circumstances holistically, she failed to render a full and proper account when demanded, undisclosed sale proceeds and substantial URA allowances were not accounted for and were largely reinvested into a property registered in the names of beneficiaries (the so‑called Ancestral Home), she placed significant estate cash in time deposits in her own or joint names, and there existed such hostility with majority beneficiaries that administration would be impeded; replacement by an independent professional administratrix and an order for a full account within 21 days were necessary and in beneficiaries' interests.
Court Disposition
Order removing 1st Defendant as administratrix; appointment of Ms Tse Man Shan, Anna as new administratrix; direction for 1st Defendant to render full and proper account within 21 days; costs nisi personally against 1st Defendant; no order as to damages or costs against 2nd and 3rd Defendants.
Orders
- 1st Defendant removed as administratrix of the Estate
- Ms Tse Man Shan, Anna of HOF Advisory and Consulting Limited appointed as new administratrix of the Estate
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment