CHAN SUN JUDY v. QIN XIAOJIAN, the sole administrator of the estate of CHAN WAI HING ALEXANDER, deceased
The administratrix was removed because she participated in transactions which involved sale of estate assets to herself and close relatives through the company that held estate assets, creating a clear conflict of interest and amounting to self‑dealing that endangered the proper administration of the estate; the Court was satisfied removal was necessary to investigate and protect beneficiaries and appointed an independent solicitor (Mr Wong Tak Shing) as administrator, revoking the existing grant and issuing directions for inventory, delivery of documents and assets, and specified costs orders.
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 5225
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hcmp 2396/2024); 3rd Defendant (hcmp 142/2025): Chan Sun Judy; Plaintiff (hcmp 142/2025): Chen Taocheng; Administratrix of the Estate; Defendant: Qin Xiao Jian; 2nd Defendant (hcmp 142/2025): Chan Kwun Shing
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 4 November 2025
- Case Number
- HCMP2396/2024
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration – Removal of Administratrix; Applications Under Probate and Administration Ordinance S33(3) / Judgment (decision Issued 4 November 2025)
- Outcome
- Application to remove administratrix granted; existing Letters of Administration revoked; independent administrator appointed; detailed ancillary orders made; costs ordered nisi in specified parts.
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Administrator, Self‑dealing/conflict of Interest, Locus Standi for Intestacy Claims, Admissibility of Foreign DNA Reports (hearsay), Costs Allocation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chan Sun Judy
Plaintiff (hcmp 2396/2024); 3rd Defendant (hcmp 142/2025)
Chen Taocheng
Plaintiff (hcmp 142/2025)
Qin Xiao Jian
Administratrix of the Estate; Defendant
Chan Kwun Shing
2nd Defendant (hcmp 142/2025)
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration – Removal of Administratrix; Applications Under Probate and Administration Ordinance S33(3) / Judgment (decision Issued 4 November 2025)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the administratrix (Qin Xiao Jian) should be removed under s33(3) Probate and Administration Ordinance for due and proper administration of the estate
- 2 Whether sales of estate properties to the administratrix and relatives through the company amounted to prohibited self‑dealing or put the estate at risk
- 3 Whether Chen Taocheng has locus standi to bring HCMP 142/2025 as a possible beneficiary (illegitimate son)
Ratio Decidendi
The administratrix was removed because she participated in transactions which involved sale of estate assets to herself and close relatives through the company that held estate assets, creating a clear conflict of interest and amounting to self‑dealing that endangered the proper administration of the estate; the Court was satisfied removal was necessary to investigate and protect beneficiaries and appointed an independent solicitor (Mr Wong Tak Shing) as administrator, revoking the existing grant and issuing directions for inventory, delivery of documents and assets, and specified costs orders.
Court Disposition
Application to remove administratrix granted; existing Letters of Administration revoked; independent administrator appointed; detailed ancillary orders made; costs ordered nisi in specified parts.
Orders
- Revoke Letters of Administration (Grant No. HCAG18855/2023) granted to Qin Xiao Jian
- Remove Qin Xiao Jian as administratrix of the Estate
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment