LAM KA WAI REBECCA AND ANOTHER v. LAM JENNY, THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LAM KAM WAI AND OTHERS
There were reasonable grounds for forensic investigation into the Subject Assets (the GTE Sum and the Rainbow Rich loan) given conflicting explanations, incomplete documentary support and accounting entries; forensic accounting expertise was required; accordingly the court removed the existing administrators and appointed Derek Lai and Guy Norman of Deloitte (as professional administrators) to investigate and administer the estate, with costs reserved.
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 3653
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Lam Ka Wai Rebecca; 2nd Plaintiff: Lam Kai Cheung; 1st Defendant: Lam Jenny; 2nd Defendant: Chui Pak Ming Norman; 3rd Defendant: Lam Calina Ka Ling; 4th Defendant: Lam Ka Kei Annie; 5th Defendant: Lam Philip Kai Tak
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 5 December 2022
- Case Number
- HCMP1014/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration Originating Summons (order 85 Rules of the High Court; Probate and Administration Ordinance) / Hearing Concluded; Reserved Decision on Appointment of Administrators and Ancillary Directions
- Outcome
- Existing administrators Lam Jenny and Chui Pak Ming Norman removed; Derek Lai and Guy Norman of Deloitte appointed as professional administrators; ancillary orders made in terms of draft and costs to be determined by written submissions
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Administrators, Appointment of Professional Administrator, Investigation of Estate Assets, Shareholder Loans, Deed of Family Arrangement, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lam Ka Wai Rebecca
1st Plaintiff
Lam Kai Cheung
2nd Plaintiff
Lam Jenny
1st Defendant
Chui Pak Ming Norman
2nd Defendant
Lam Calina Ka Ling
3rd Defendant
Lam Ka Kei Annie
4th Defendant
Lam Philip Kai Tak
5th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration Originating Summons (order 85 Rules of the High Court; Probate and Administration Ordinance) / Hearing Concluded; Reserved Decision on Appointment of Administrators and Ancillary Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether existing administrators should be removed and replaced
- 2 Whether reasonable grounds exist for forensic investigation of the Subject Assets (GTE Sum and Rainbow Rich loan)
- 3 Whether independent professional administrator(s) should be appointed and if so whether one or two
Ratio Decidendi
There were reasonable grounds for forensic investigation into the Subject Assets (the GTE Sum and the Rainbow Rich loan) given conflicting explanations, incomplete documentary support and accounting entries; forensic accounting expertise was required; accordingly the court removed the existing administrators and appointed Derek Lai and Guy Norman of Deloitte (as professional administrators) to investigate and administer the estate, with costs reserved.
Court Disposition
Existing administrators Lam Jenny and Chui Pak Ming Norman removed; Derek Lai and Guy Norman of Deloitte appointed as professional administrators; ancillary orders made in terms of draft and costs to be determined by written submissions
Orders
- Orders in terms of paragraphs 1 to 7 of the draft order submitted by Plaintiffs' counsel (Mr Tang) granted
- Remove Lam Jenny and Chui Pak Ming Norman as administrators of the estate and appoint Derek Lai and Guy Norman of Deloitte as administrators in their place
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment