Chee Yuen Industrial Co. Ltd. v. Global Wise Engineering Ltd.

Chee Yuen Industrial Co. Ltd. v. Global Wise Engineering Ltd.

The court found the defendant repudiated the tenancy and the plaintiff took reasonable and timely steps to mitigate loss; the claimed items (rent loss, shortfall to 20 January 2000, management fee, pro rata rates and rent for 16 April–7 May 1999, agent's commission and legal costs) flowed from the breach and were recoverable. The court assessed and awarded damages in the total of $156,659.34 in favour of the plaintiff.

Citation
Chee Yuen Industrial Co. Ltd. v. Global Wise Engineering Ltd.
Parties
Plaintiff (landlord): Chee Yuen Industrial Co Ltd; Defendant (tenant): Global Wise Engineering Ltd
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
26 January 2000
Case Number
HCA7058/1999
Procedural Posture
Civil Action Landlord and Tenant (assessment of Damages) / Assessment of Damages Following Final and Interlocutory Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant ordered to pay damages of $156,659.34 to plaintiff.
Legal Topics
Repudiation, Mitigation of Loss, Quantum of Damages, Agent Commission, Rates and Government Rent, Management Fees, Legal Costs
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chee Yuen Industrial Co Ltd

Plaintiff (landlord)

Global Wise Engineering Ltd

Defendant (tenant)

Procedural Posture

Civil Action Landlord and Tenant (assessment of Damages) / Assessment of Damages Following Final and Interlocutory Judgment

  1. 1 Whether defendant repudiated the tenancy
  2. 2 Whether plaintiff mitigated loss reasonably
  3. 3 What items of loss are recoverable (rent loss, shortfall, management fee, rates, agent commission, legal costs)

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the defendant repudiated the tenancy and the plaintiff took reasonable and timely steps to mitigate loss; the claimed items (rent loss, shortfall to 20 January 2000, management fee, pro rata rates and rent for 16 April–7 May 1999, agent's commission and legal costs) flowed from the breach and were recoverable. The court assessed and awarded damages in the total of $156,659.34 in favour of the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant ordered to pay damages of $156,659.34 to plaintiff.

Orders

  • Defendant to pay plaintiff the sum of HKD 156,659.34 as damages
  • Costs noted and to be dealt with (discussion on costs recorded)