JOHN ROBERT LEES AND ANOTHER v. TAN LAM CHUAN
In the absence of a stay the court will require compliance with an existing Payment Order; accordingly the liquidators were ordered to authorize the Official Receiver to pay HK$472,000 to Ng & Partners out of the company liquidation account within 14 days, leave was granted (if required) to the liquidators to apply...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- JOHN ROBERT LEES AND ANOTHER v. TAN LAM CHUAN
- Parties
- Joint and Several Liquidator of Promail International (hk) Limited (in Liquidation) Applicant: John Robert Lees; Joint and Several Liquidator of Promail International (hk) Limited (in Liquidation) Applicant: Desmond Chung Seng Chiong; Respondent Director and Shareholder of the Company: Tan Lam Chuan
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2005
- Case Number
- HCCW373/2002
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) No. 373 of 2002 / Summons for Directions Following Variation and Discharge of Restraint Order; Interlocutory Hearing
- Outcome
- Summons for directions granted in part; liquidators ordered to comply with Payment Order; leave to seek out of time appeal permitted if required; costs orders made
- Legal Topics
- Restraint Order Variation, Payment Order, Duties of Liquidators, Costs (common Fund Basis), Leave to Appeal Under Companies Ordinance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Robert Lees
Joint and Several Liquidator of Promail International (hk) Limited (in Liquidation) Applicant
Desmond Chung Seng Chiong
Joint and Several Liquidator of Promail International (hk) Limited (in Liquidation) Applicant
Tan Lam Chuan
Respondent Director and Shareholder of the Company
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) No. 373 of 2002 / Summons for Directions Following Variation and Discharge of Restraint Order; Interlocutory Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether funds of a company in liquidation may be applied to pay legal costs of a shareholder
- 2 Whether liquidators are obliged to preserve funds to satisfy a court payment order made prior to their control of the accounts
- 3 Whether leave under section 186 Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) was required or could be granted out of time
Ratio Decidendi
In the absence of a stay the court will require compliance with an existing Payment Order; accordingly the liquidators were ordered to authorize the Official Receiver to pay HK$472,000 to Ng & Partners out of the company liquidation account within 14 days, leave was granted (if required) to the liquidators to apply for leave to appeal out of time under section 186 Cap.32, and costs were ordered to be paid out of the company assets (Ng & Partners' costs taxed on a common fund basis).
Court Disposition
Summons for directions granted in part; liquidators ordered to comply with Payment Order; leave to seek out of time appeal permitted if required; costs orders made
Orders
- Liquidators to authorize the Official Receiver to pay HK$472,000.00 to Ng & Partners out of the company's liquidation account within 14 days in compliance with Gall J's Payment Order dated 25 February 2005.
- Leave, if required, under section 186 of Cap. 32 granted to the liquidators to apply for leave to appeal against the Payment Order out of time and to pursue such appeal if leave is granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment