BATES CHINA LTD v. CASH ASSETS LTD AND ANOTHER
The court found on the balance of probabilities that oral agreements existed adopting the terms of the unsigned Agency Agreements (except the bonus clause), that defendants accepted those terms by conduct (including payment of the stated retainer), and that plaintiffs provided services during the relevant periods; accordingly defendants were liable to pay the agreed monthly retainer fees for the claimed periods with contractual interest and costs.
- Citation
- BATES CHINA LTD v. CASH ASSETS LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hca1572/2003): Bates Hong Kong Limited; Plaintiff (hca1675/2003): Bates China Limited; 1st Defendant (both Actions): Cash Assets Limited; 2nd Defendant (hca1572/2003): Pricerite Stores Limited; 2nd Defendant (hca1675/2003): Pricerite Group Limited; Non‑party Holding Company (referred): Celestial Asia Securities Holding Ltd
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 9 August 2005
- Case Number
- HCA1675/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil: Contract/commercial (claims for Unpaid Retainer Fees and Quantum Meruit) / Judgment (court of First Instance, Judgment Delivered 9 August 2005)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiffs in both actions. Defendants liable to pay unpaid retainer fees and contractual interest; costs ordered nisi in favour of plaintiffs.
- Legal Topics
- Retainer Agreements, Quantum Meruit, Acceptance by Conduct, Termination Clause, Interest on Overdue Payments, Agency Authority
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bates Hong Kong Limited
Plaintiff (hca1572/2003)
Bates China Limited
Plaintiff (hca1675/2003)
Cash Assets Limited
1st Defendant (both Actions)
Pricerite Stores Limited
2nd Defendant (hca1572/2003)
Pricerite Group Limited
2nd Defendant (hca1675/2003)
Celestial Asia Securities Holding Ltd
Non‑party Holding Company (referred)
Procedural Posture
Civil: Contract/commercial (claims for Unpaid Retainer Fees and Quantum Meruit) / Judgment (court of First Instance, Judgment Delivered 9 August 2005)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether unsigned written agency agreements were enforceable by reason of oral agreement and acceptance by conduct
- 2 Whether defendants accepted the terms (including monthly retainer) by conduct/performance
- 3 Whether services were rendered during the claimed periods and therefore entitlement to retainer or quantum meruit
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on the balance of probabilities that oral agreements existed adopting the terms of the unsigned Agency Agreements (except the bonus clause), that defendants accepted those terms by conduct (including payment of the stated retainer), and that plaintiffs provided services during the relevant periods; accordingly defendants were liable to pay the agreed monthly retainer fees for the claimed periods with contractual interest and costs.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiffs in both actions. Defendants liable to pay unpaid retainer fees and contractual interest; costs ordered nisi in favour of plaintiffs.
Orders
- HCA1572/2003: Judgment for Bates Hong Kong Limited against Cash Assets Limited and Pricerite Stores Limited in the sum of HK$1,383,226 with interest at 1.5% per month from date of writ until judgment and thereafter at judgment rate.
- HCA1675/2003: Judgment for Bates China Limited against Cash Assets Limited and Pricerite Group Limited for HK$1,053,500 with interest at 1.5% per month from date of writ until judgment and thereafter at judgment rate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment