TSANG CHOI NGUN (suing as one of the executors and trustees of the estate of WONG WAI FONG, deceased) v. WONG WAN CHI ANITA
The grant of probate was revoked and the Defendant removed as executrix because the Defendant obstructed administration, claimed to have destroyed the grant, refused to cooperate and became unresponsive, creating a supervening defect that justified revocation rather than mere removal; a fresh grant to the Plaintiff as sole executrix was ordered to avoid further delay, and costs were awarded to the Plaintiff on an indemnity basis in the sum of HKD 150,000, with the Plaintiff's own costs to be paid from the estate.
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 777
- Parties
- Plaintiff; One of the Executors and Trustees of the Estate of Wong Wai Fong (deceased): Tsang Choi Ngun; Defendant; Joint Executrix of the Will of Wong Wai Fong (deceased): Wong Wan Chi Anita
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2021
- Case Number
- HCMP223/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration (revocation/removal of Grant and Executrix) / Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Amendment application granted; grant of probate revoked; Defendant removed as executrix; fresh grant to be issued to Plaintiff as sole executrix upon compliance with Probate Registry requirements; Defendant ordered to lodge original grant with Probate Registry within 14 days; Defendant to pay Plaintiff's costs on...
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Removal of Executor/executrix, Assent and Vesting, Amendment of Originating Summons, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Costs Assessment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tsang Choi Ngun
Plaintiff; One of the Executors and Trustees of the Estate of Wong Wai Fong (deceased)
Wong Wan Chi Anita
Defendant; Joint Executrix of the Will of Wong Wai Fong (deceased)
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration (revocation/removal of Grant and Executrix) / Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of probate should be revoked
- 2 Whether the Defendant should be removed as executrix
- 3 Whether a fresh grant should be issued to the Plaintiff as sole executrix
Ratio Decidendi
The grant of probate was revoked and the Defendant removed as executrix because the Defendant obstructed administration, claimed to have destroyed the grant, refused to cooperate and became unresponsive, creating a supervening defect that justified revocation rather than mere removal; a fresh grant to the Plaintiff as sole executrix was ordered to avoid further delay, and costs were awarded to the Plaintiff on an indemnity basis in the sum of HKD 150,000, with the Plaintiff's own costs to be paid from the estate.
Court Disposition
Amendment application granted; grant of probate revoked; Defendant removed as executrix; fresh grant to be issued to Plaintiff as sole executrix upon compliance with Probate Registry requirements; Defendant ordered to lodge original grant with Probate Registry within 14 days; Defendant to pay Plaintiff's costs on...
Orders
- Amendment of the originating summons granted to include revocation relief
- The grant of probate dated 29 October 2019 is revoked
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment