LEE KWAI KEUNG v. KWO SZE
The consent summonses were dismissed because the plaintiffs failed to adduce any evidence proving the due execution or validity of the wills, there were unexplained and inexplicable dispositions and relationships raising questions about validity, procedural requirements had not been complied with, and the court was not prepared to try the probate actions on affidavit evidence or to grant probate in solemn form by consent without examination of underlying evidence.
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 925
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hcap 19/2017): Chu Pong Yuen; Plaintiff (hcap 27/2017): Lee Kwai Keung; Defendant (hcap 19/2017): Madam Lee; Defendant (hcap 27/2017): Madam Kwo
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2019
- Case Number
- HCAP27/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Action Seeking Revocation of Letters of Administration and Grant of Probate / Consent Summons; Directed Oral Hearing on Consent Summonses
- Outcome
- The 1st and 2nd consent summonses were dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant of Letters of Administration, Probate in Solemn Form, Affidavit of Testamentary Scripts, Consent Summons Procedure, Trial on Affidavit Evidence, Proof of Due Execution of a Will
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chu Pong Yuen
Plaintiff (hcap 19/2017)
Lee Kwai Keung
Plaintiff (hcap 27/2017)
Madam Lee
Defendant (hcap 19/2017)
Madam Kwo
Defendant (hcap 27/2017)
Procedural Posture
Probate Action Seeking Revocation of Letters of Administration and Grant of Probate / Consent Summons; Directed Oral Hearing on Consent Summonses
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether consent summonses could be granted to revoke grants of letters of administration and to grant probate without evidence proving due execution of the wills
- 2 Whether parties complied with procedural requirements under Order 76
- 3 Whether the court should try the probate actions on affidavit evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The consent summonses were dismissed because the plaintiffs failed to adduce any evidence proving the due execution or validity of the wills, there were unexplained and inexplicable dispositions and relationships raising questions about validity, procedural requirements had not been complied with, and the court was not prepared to try the probate actions on affidavit evidence or to grant probate in solemn form by consent without examination of underlying evidence.
Court Disposition
The 1st and 2nd consent summonses were dismissed.
Orders
- Dismissal of the consent summonses in HCAP 19/2017 and HCAP 27/2017
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment