KWOK MAY SIN KYLIE (IN HER PERSONAL CAPACITY AND IN HER CAPACITY AS THE INTENDED PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF KWOK MEI LUNG, DECEASED) v. FU KE AN
The LA Grant was revoked and probate granted to the plaintiff because a valid solicitor‑drafted will existed and had been properly attested and proved, and because the defendant obtained the ex parte letters of administration without disclosing material facts and without exercising the required due diligence; accordingly the defendant must bear the costs of the proceedings on an indemnity basis.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 343
- Parties
- Plaintiff (sister, Sole Executrix and Beneficiary Under Will): Kwok May Sin Kylie; Defendant (grantee of Letters of Administration): Defendant (husband of the deceased); Deceased: Kwok Mei Lung
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 5 March 2020
- Case Number
- HCMP302/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration Revocation of Letters of Administration and Grant of Probate / Judgment: Reasons for Decision and Decision on Costs (high Court Hearing and Order)
- Outcome
- The court revoked the letters of administration granted to the defendant, ordered grant of probate to the plaintiff, made consequential trust and vesting orders in favour of the plaintiff, and ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs on an indemnity basis.
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Letters of Administration, Grant of Probate, Full and Frank Disclosure in Ex Parte Probate Applications, Duty of Due Diligence When Applying for Grant, Proof and Propounding of a Will, Costs on Indemnity Basis
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kwok May Sin Kylie
Plaintiff (sister, Sole Executrix and Beneficiary Under Will)
Defendant (husband of the deceased)
Defendant (grantee of Letters of Administration)
Kwok Mei Lung
Deceased
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration Revocation of Letters of Administration and Grant of Probate / Judgment: Reasons for Decision and Decision on Costs (high Court Hearing and Order)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the letters of administration granted to the defendant should be revoked
- 2 Whether the Will dated 23 August 2016 is valid and properly proved
- 3 Whether the defendant failed to make full and frank disclosure and to exercise due diligence before obtaining the LA Grant
Ratio Decidendi
The LA Grant was revoked and probate granted to the plaintiff because a valid solicitor‑drafted will existed and had been properly attested and proved, and because the defendant obtained the ex parte letters of administration without disclosing material facts and without exercising the required due diligence; accordingly the defendant must bear the costs of the proceedings on an indemnity basis.
Court Disposition
The court revoked the letters of administration granted to the defendant, ordered grant of probate to the plaintiff, made consequential trust and vesting orders in favour of the plaintiff, and ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs on an indemnity basis.
Orders
- Revocation of the letters of administration granted to the defendant under Grant No HCAG 2651/2018 dated 28 February 2018
- Grant of probate to the plaintiff in respect of the Deceased's estate upon compliance with any Probate Registry requisitions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment