THE QUEEN v. NG YUK YING
Section 19(2) of the Magistrates Ordinance gives the defendant a statutory right to make a closing speech whether or not represented; the appellant was not afforded that right and the denial amounted to an infringement warranting quashing of the conviction and refunding of the fine.
- Citation
- THE QUEEN v. NG YUK YING
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: NG Yuk-ying; Respondent/crown: The Queen
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 1987
- Case Number
- HCMA625/1987
- Procedural Posture
- Magistracy Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; fine refunded if paid
- Legal Topics
- Right to Make Closing Speech, Section 19(2) Magistrates Ordinance, Fair Trial, Procedural Fairness, Conviction Quashed
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NG Yuk-ying
Appellant/defendant
The Queen
Respondent/crown
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 19(2) of the Magistrates Ordinance confers a statutory right on a defendant to make a closing speech
- 2 Whether failure to afford a closing speech renders the trial unfair and justifies quashing the conviction
- 3 Whether admissions during cross-examination or defence counsel's failure to object operate as waiver of the right to a closing speech
Ratio Decidendi
Section 19(2) of the Magistrates Ordinance gives the defendant a statutory right to make a closing speech whether or not represented; the appellant was not afforded that right and the denial amounted to an infringement warranting quashing of the conviction and refunding of the fine.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; fine refunded if paid
Orders
- Allow the appeal
- Quash the conviction
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment