RE CHINA NATIONAL AVIATION CO LTD
The scheme was sanctioned and the reduction confirmed because all statutory and procedural requirements under the Companies Ordinance were complied with: the class was properly constituted and fairly represented, the explanatory statement provided sufficient information, the requisite majority approved the scheme, independent advisors recommended it, undertakings were given by affected parties, and the court was satisfied creditors would not be prejudiced; accordingly the scheme and attendant reduction have a proper purpose and effect and an order in terms of the draft was made.
- Citation
- RE CHINA NATIONAL AVIATION CO LTD
- Parties
- Petitioner: China National Aviation Company Limited; Majority Shareholder / Proposed Transferee: Air China Limited; Minority Shareholder / Undertaking Party: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated; Minority Shareholder / Undertaking Party: Merrill Lynch International; Option Grantees / Interested Parties: Four grantees of the share option scheme
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2007
- Case Number
- HCMP2290/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Ordinance Scheme of Arrangement and Reduction of Capital / Sanction and Confirmation Hearing; Judgment (reasons Delivered)
- Outcome
- Scheme of arrangement sanctioned and reduction of capital confirmed; order in terms of the draft submitted made by the Court
- Legal Topics
- Scheme of Arrangement, Reduction of Capital, Shareholder Meetings and Voting, Creditor Protection, Takeovers Code Compliance
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
China National Aviation Company Limited
Petitioner
Air China Limited
Majority Shareholder / Proposed Transferee
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Minority Shareholder / Undertaking Party
Merrill Lynch International
Minority Shareholder / Undertaking Party
Four grantees of the share option scheme
Option Grantees / Interested Parties
Procedural Posture
Companies Ordinance Scheme of Arrangement and Reduction of Capital / Sanction and Confirmation Hearing; Judgment (reasons Delivered)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed scheme of arrangement under section 166 should be sanctioned by the court
- 2 Whether the proposed reduction of share capital under section 58 should be confirmed
- 3 Whether the class of members was properly constituted and fairly represented at the court meeting
Ratio Decidendi
The scheme was sanctioned and the reduction confirmed because all statutory and procedural requirements under the Companies Ordinance were complied with: the class was properly constituted and fairly represented, the explanatory statement provided sufficient information, the requisite majority approved the scheme, independent advisors recommended it, undertakings were given by affected parties, and the court was satisfied creditors would not be prejudiced; accordingly the scheme and attendant reduction have a proper purpose and effect and an order in terms of the draft was made.
Court Disposition
Scheme of arrangement sanctioned and reduction of capital confirmed; order in terms of the draft submitted made by the Court
Orders
- Scheme of arrangement under section 166 of the Companies Ordinance sanctioned as drafted
- Proposed reduction of share capital under section 58 of the Companies Ordinance confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment