RE LEHMAN BROTHERS SECURITIES ASIA LTD (In Liquidation)
The Court sanctioned the three Schemes because the statutory procedures were complied with, explanatory statements were sufficient to inform creditors, the single-class composition was justified by creditors' common interest in avoiding litigation and achieving an expedient distribution, and the statutory majorities required by the Companies Ordinance voted in favour; accordingly the Schemes are ones that an intelligent and honest member might reasonably approve.
- Citation
- RE LEHMAN BROTHERS SECURITIES ASIA LTD (In Liquidation)
- Parties
- Scheme Company (in Liquidation): Lehman Brothers Asia Limited; Scheme Company (in Liquidation): Lehman Brothers Futures Asia Limited; Scheme Company (in Liquidation): Lehman Brothers Securities Asia Limited; Interested Party/ultimate Holding Company: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2017
- Case Number
- HCMP2266/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Sanction of Schemes of Arrangement Under Part 13 Division 2 of the Companies Ordinance (cap 622) / Sanction Hearing and Reasons for Decision
- Outcome
- The Court sanctioned each of the three Schemes of arrangement.
- Legal Topics
- Scheme of Arrangement, Post Liquidation Interest (pli), Provable and Non Provable Claims, Priority and Order of Distribution, Constitution of Classes for Scheme Meetings
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lehman Brothers Asia Limited
Scheme Company (in Liquidation)
Lehman Brothers Futures Asia Limited
Scheme Company (in Liquidation)
Lehman Brothers Securities Asia Limited
Scheme Company (in Liquidation)
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc
Interested Party/ultimate Holding Company
Procedural Posture
Sanction of Schemes of Arrangement Under Part 13 Division 2 of the Companies Ordinance (cap 622) / Sanction Hearing and Reasons for Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether PLI should be treated interest-first or principal-first and the accrual date for PLI
- 2 Whether PLI is payable on contingent or non-provable claims
- 3 Whether non-provable claims (notably currency conversion claims) are enforceable under Hong Kong law
Ratio Decidendi
The Court sanctioned the three Schemes because the statutory procedures were complied with, explanatory statements were sufficient to inform creditors, the single-class composition was justified by creditors' common interest in avoiding litigation and achieving an expedient distribution, and the statutory majorities required by the Companies Ordinance voted in favour; accordingly the Schemes are ones that an intelligent and honest member might reasonably approve.
Court Disposition
The Court sanctioned each of the three Schemes of arrangement.
Orders
- Sanctioned the schemes of arrangement for Lehman Brothers Asia Limited, Lehman Brothers Futures Asia Limited and Lehman Brothers Securities Asia Limited pursuant to Part 13 Division 2 of the Companies Ordinance (Cap 622).
- Declared that the statutory requirements for convening meetings, provision of explanatory statements and obtaining requisite majorities had been satisfied.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment