RE LIGHT TIME INVESTMENTS LTD
The one-stage approach is rejected: s12A(2) creates a discretion that only arises after payment into court and the court has no jurisdiction to declare land free from encumbrance before payment. The court therefore ordered payment into court under s12A(1), required public advertisement to notify potential mortgagees, and permitted a paper application under s12A(2) for the declaration after specified publicity and waiting periods; no costs ordered.
- Citation
- RE LIGHT TIME INVESTMENTS LTD
- Parties
- Applicant/plaintiff: Light Time Investments Limited; Encumbrancers/respondents: Mortgagees (various, largely unknown); Interested Party: The Government (interested party)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2010
- Case Number
- HCMP345/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Section 12 a Conveyancing and Property Ordinance (cap.219) / Interim Order for Payment Into Court Made; Further Paper Hearing Under S12 A(2) to Follow After Advertisement
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: payments into court ordered under s12A(1); declaration under s12A(2) deferred pending advertisement and further paper application.
- Legal Topics
- Section 12 a CPO, Payment Into Court, Mortgage Discharge, Substituted Service/advertisement, In Situ Land Exchange
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Light Time Investments Limited
Applicant/plaintiff
Mortgagees (various, largely unknown)
Encumbrancers/respondents
The Government (interested party)
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 12 a Conveyancing and Property Ordinance (cap.219) / Interim Order for Payment Into Court Made; Further Paper Hearing Under S12 A(2) to Follow After Advertisement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can grant a declaration freeing land from registered mortgages before payment into court under s12A
- 2 Whether a one-stage procedure (payment and declaration simultaneously) is permissible
- 3 Whether adequate steps have been taken to locate mortgagees and whether substituted service/advertisement is required
Ratio Decidendi
The one-stage approach is rejected: s12A(2) creates a discretion that only arises after payment into court and the court has no jurisdiction to declare land free from encumbrance before payment. The court therefore ordered payment into court under s12A(1), required public advertisement to notify potential mortgagees, and permitted a paper application under s12A(2) for the declaration after specified publicity and waiting periods; no costs ordered.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: payments into court ordered under s12A(1); declaration under s12A(2) deferred pending advertisement and further paper application.
Orders
- Applicant to pay into court the sums stated in the applications or the larger sums in the applicant's written opening to redeem the registered mortgages and any interest, pursuant to s12A(1) CPO
- Within seven days after payment into court the applicant must advertise in a widely circulated local Chinese newspaper notice of the order and payment and state that any person interested may apply within 14 days to be joined as a respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment