LERIC INTERNATIONAL LTD (In Liquidation) v. EASYRICH INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD AND ANOTHER
The court refused to set aside the 2nd Mortgage as an unfair preference because there was no evidence of a subjective desire to prefer Yee Fu; the court granted validation under section 182 of the Provisional Sale and Purchase Agreement and the Assignment (and the $668,300 payment) because the sale price was close to market, proceeds discharged secured creditors (so unsecured creditors were not prejudiced), reasonable commercial steps and concessions were shown, and the statutory discretion favored validation in the circumstances.
- Citation
- LERIC INTERNATIONAL LTD (In Liquidation) v. EASYRICH INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Applicant (in Liquidation): LERIC INTERNATIONAL LIMITED; 1st Respondent: EASYRICH INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED; 2nd Respondent: YEE FU INVESTMENT FINANCE LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2009
- Case Number
- HCCW450/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) No. 450 of 2006 / Decision (chambers) 13 January 2009
- Outcome
- Validation order granted: Provisional Sale and Purchase Agreement and Assignment validated; payment of $668,300 validated; 2nd Mortgage not set aside as unfair preference; costs allocated as ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Section 182 Validation Orders, Unfair Preference (sections 266 and 266 B), Extortionate Credit (section 264 B), Mortgagee Sale to Related Purchaser, Costs in Liquidation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LERIC INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Applicant (in Liquidation)
EASYRICH INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED
1st Respondent
YEE FU INVESTMENT FINANCE LIMITED
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) No. 450 of 2006 / Decision (chambers) 13 January 2009
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2nd Mortgage constituted an unfair preference and should be set aside under sections 266 and 266B of the Companies Ordinance
- 2 Whether the Provisional Sale and Purchase Agreement and the Assignment are void under section 182 or should be validated
- 3 Whether the loan agreement was extortionate or otherwise vitiated
Ratio Decidendi
The court refused to set aside the 2nd Mortgage as an unfair preference because there was no evidence of a subjective desire to prefer Yee Fu; the court granted validation under section 182 of the Provisional Sale and Purchase Agreement and the Assignment (and the $668,300 payment) because the sale price was close to market, proceeds discharged secured creditors (so unsecured creditors were not prejudiced), reasonable commercial steps and concessions were shown, and the statutory discretion favored validation in the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Validation order granted: Provisional Sale and Purchase Agreement and Assignment validated; payment of $668,300 validated; 2nd Mortgage not set aside as unfair preference; costs allocated as ordered.
Orders
- Validation order under section 182 in favour of Easyrich for the Provisional Sale and Purchase Agreement and the Assignment
- Validation order under section 182 in respect of the payment of HK$668,300 to Yee Fu
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment