THE JOINT AND SEVERAL TRUSTEES OF THE PROPERTY OF LAI KWOK YING (A BANKRUPT) formerly t/a GOOD VIEW ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT CO v. SHUN YUEN CONSTRUCTION CO LTD AND ANOTHER
The trustees satisfied the legal test: the documents sought in items (a) and (b) were reasonably required and the respondents were capable of providing them; the court ordered production of items (a) and (b), inspection and safe custody directions, and affidavits of dealings within 28 days; item (d) was not ordered; respondents were ordered to pay the trustees' costs assessed at HKD 113,432.
- Citation
- THE JOINT AND SEVERAL TRUSTEES OF THE PROPERTY OF LAI KWOK YING (A BANKRUPT) formerly t/a GOOD VIEW ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT CO v. SHUN YUEN CONSTRUCTION CO LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Applicants: The Joint and Several Trustees of the property of Lai Kwok Ying (A Bankrupt) formerly trading as Good View Engineering Management Company; 1st Respondent: Shun Yuen Construction Company Limited; 2nd Respondent: Bestkind International Construction Company Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 August 2009
- Case Number
- HCB8750/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Proceedings (s29 Application) / Interlocutory Application Heard and Decided (production and Examination Order)
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Section 29 Bankruptcy Ordinance, Production of Documents, Private Examination (s221 Companies Ordinance Analogies), Affidavit of Dealings, Costs Assessment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Joint and Several Trustees of the property of Lai Kwok Ying (A Bankrupt) formerly trading as Good View Engineering Management Company
Applicants
Shun Yuen Construction Company Limited
1st Respondent
Bestkind International Construction Company Limited
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Proceedings (s29 Application) / Interlocutory Application Heard and Decided (production and Examination Order)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trustees established that the documents and information were reasonably required to perform their functions under s29
- 2 Whether respondents were prima facie able to provide the requested documents
- 3 Whether the catch-all item (d) was too broad and oppressive
Ratio Decidendi
The trustees satisfied the legal test: the documents sought in items (a) and (b) were reasonably required and the respondents were capable of providing them; the court ordered production of items (a) and (b), inspection and safe custody directions, and affidavits of dealings within 28 days; item (d) was not ordered; respondents were ordered to pay the trustees' costs assessed at HKD 113,432.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Respondents ordered to produce documents listed in items (a) and (b) of the summons; if documents are not in their possession they must swear when they parted with possession and where the documents are now located
- Respondents to permit inspection and ensure safe custody of produced documents pursuant to paragraphs 3 and 4 of the summons
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment