DONG FEI v. AMERASIA GLOBAL PROPERTY LTD AND ANOTHER
The application to bring forward the substantive determination of HCMP 1040/2018 was dismissed because there was no real change of circumstances warranting variation of the prior early‑trial directions; the amended s.570 claim was not clearly unanswerable without regard to AGPL's linked claims (pre‑emptive right and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 1475
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hca 1202/2018); 1st Defendant (hcmp 1040/2018); Petitioner (hcmp 1089/2018): Amerasia Global Property Limited; 1st Defendant (hca 1202/2018); Plaintiff (hcmp 1040/2018); 1st Respondent (hcmp 1089/2018): Dong Fei; 2nd Defendant (hca 1202/2018 & HCMP 1040/2018); 2nd Respondent (hcmp 1089/2018): Treasure (HK) Investment Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2019
- Case Number
- HCMP1040/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Company/shareholder Disputes (specific Performance, Unfair Prejudice, S.570 CO Application) / Interlocutory Applications at Pre Trial Stage; Application to Bring Forward Substantive Determination of HCMP 1040/2018
- Outcome
- Application to bring forward substantive determination of HCMP 1040/2018 dismissed with costs; no order made on AGPL's interlocutory injunction summons in HCMP 1089/2018
- Legal Topics
- Section 570 Companies Ordinance, Unfair Prejudice Petition, Pre Emptive Rights, Quasi Partnership, Case Management, Interlocutory Injunction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amerasia Global Property Limited
Plaintiff (hca 1202/2018); 1st Defendant (hcmp 1040/2018); Petitioner (hcmp 1089/2018)
Dong Fei
1st Defendant (hca 1202/2018); Plaintiff (hcmp 1040/2018); 1st Respondent (hcmp 1089/2018)
Treasure (HK) Investment Limited
2nd Defendant (hca 1202/2018 & HCMP 1040/2018); 2nd Respondent (hcmp 1089/2018)
Procedural Posture
Company/shareholder Disputes (specific Performance, Unfair Prejudice, S.570 CO Application) / Interlocutory Applications at Pre Trial Stage; Application to Bring Forward Substantive Determination of HCMP 1040/2018
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should vary earlier case management directions to bring forward substantive determination of HCMP 1040/2018
- 2 Whether the s.570 Companies Ordinance application for a court-ordered general meeting is clearly unanswerable and can be summarily determined before linked proceedings
- 3 Whether alleged oral shareholders' agreement/quasi-partnership prevents exercise of statutory rights and justifies injunctive relief
Ratio Decidendi
The application to bring forward the substantive determination of HCMP 1040/2018 was dismissed because there was no real change of circumstances warranting variation of the prior early‑trial directions; the amended s.570 claim was not clearly unanswerable without regard to AGPL's linked claims (pre‑emptive right and unfair prejudice), the risk of unfair prejudice and the proximity of the scheduled consolidated trial meant the balance favored maintaining the status quo; accordingly summary determination was inappropriate and the application failed.
Court Disposition
Application to bring forward substantive determination of HCMP 1040/2018 dismissed with costs; no order made on AGPL's interlocutory injunction summons in HCMP 1089/2018
Orders
- Application in HCMP 1040/2018 dismissed with costs
- Costs to be taxed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment