LAM YAN YEE AND ANOTHER v. THIS THIS RICE (HONG KONG) LTD AND OTHERS
The plaintiffs' asserted purpose to verify whether dividends are payable under the shareholders agreement is a proper purpose under section 740; while audited financial statements and management accounts would normally suffice, the absence of verified audited accounts and evidence of suspicious conduct by defendants...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 1378
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Lam Yan Yee; 2nd Plaintiff: Tse Hiu Wang; 1st Defendant: This This Rice (Hong Kong) Limited; 2nd Defendant: Lin Xiaoling; 3rd Defendant: Keung Hon Sing Samuel
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 April 2025
- Case Number
- HCMP1979/2024
- Procedural Posture
- Section 740 Companies Ordinance Inspection Application / Decision on Originating Summons
- Legal Topics
- Section 740 Companies Ordinance, Inspection of Company Records, Subsidiary Records, Dividends, Shareholders' Agreement, Removal of Directors
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lam Yan Yee
1st Plaintiff
Tse Hiu Wang
2nd Plaintiff
This This Rice (Hong Kong) Limited
1st Defendant
Lin Xiaoling
2nd Defendant
Keung Hon Sing Samuel
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Section 740 Companies Ordinance Inspection Application / Decision on Originating Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether documents of the subsidiary companies fall within the scope of 'records or documents of the company' under section 740
- 2 Whether the applicants have a proper purpose to inspect the requested documents
- 3 Whether audited financial statements and management accounts offered by defendants are sufficient
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs' asserted purpose to verify whether dividends are payable under the shareholders agreement is a proper purpose under section 740; while audited financial statements and management accounts would normally suffice, the absence of verified audited accounts and evidence of suspicious conduct by defendants justifies a wider investigatory inspection, subject to the principle that only subsidiary records in the company's possession or to which the company is legally entitled fall within section 740.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment