RE LIU WING TING STEPHEN trading as STEPHEN LIU AND COMPANY
Although the merits showed no bona fide defence and the debtor's admissions rendered the debt due, the petition was dismissed because personal service in compliance with Rule 59 was not established; accordingly the court could not make a bankruptcy order despite substantive merit.
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 1434
- Parties
- Creditor: SKY REGAL TRADING LIMITED; Debtor: LIU WING TING STEPHEN trading as STEPHEN LIU AND COMPANY
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2025
- Case Number
- HCB4968/2024
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Judgment on Petition (ex Parte Hearing)
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Service of Process, Statutory Demand, Without Prejudice Privilege, Set Off, Admission of Liability
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SKY REGAL TRADING LIMITED
Creditor
LIU WING TING STEPHEN trading as STEPHEN LIU AND COMPANY
Debtor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Judgment on Petition (ex Parte Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the debtor had a bona fide defence on substantial grounds to the bankruptcy petition
- 2 Whether the co-operation agreement constituted an enforceable contract or a set-off extinguishing the debt
- 3 Whether Whatsapp messages were protected by without prejudice privilege and thus inadmissible
Ratio Decidendi
Although the merits showed no bona fide defence and the debtor's admissions rendered the debt due, the petition was dismissed because personal service in compliance with Rule 59 was not established; accordingly the court could not make a bankruptcy order despite substantive merit.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed
Orders
- Bankruptcy petition dismissed
- Costs to be paid by the petitioner to the debtor
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment