SO YUET HO v. WONG HON LUNG AND ANOTHER
The Court held that although a full affidavit of merits would be of greater assistance, its absence was not fatal where the defendants exhibited a draft defence and solicitors' correspondence that established triable issues; accordingly the interlocutory default judgment was set aside, but the 1st Defendant must pay the costs thrown away by his failure to file a defence in time.
- Citation
- SO YUET HO v. WONG HON LUNG AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: So Yuet Ho; Kwok Ka Hei, administrators of the estate of Tse Tam, deceased; 1st Defendant (applicant): Wong Hon Lung; 2nd Defendant: Lee Chi Kin
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 4 September 1973
- Case Number
- HCA1156/1973
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Negligence (motor Vehicle Accident) / Application to Set Aside Interlocutory Default Judgment (interlocutory Application)
- Outcome
- Interlocutory judgment dated 28 July 1973 set aside; 1st Defendant's application granted
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Default Judgment, Affidavit of Merits, Delay, Costs for Wasted Costs, Interlocutory Judgment
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
So Yuet Ho; Kwok Ka Hei, administrators of the estate of Tse Tam, deceased
Plaintiffs
Wong Hon Lung
1st Defendant (applicant)
Lee Chi Kin
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Negligence (motor Vehicle Accident) / Application to Set Aside Interlocutory Default Judgment (interlocutory Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interlocutory default judgment can be set aside in the absence of a full affidavit of merits
- 2 Whether exhibiting a draft defence and solicitors' correspondence can establish triable issues
- 3 Whether delay in filing a defence is unreasonable and fatal to the application
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that although a full affidavit of merits would be of greater assistance, its absence was not fatal where the defendants exhibited a draft defence and solicitors' correspondence that established triable issues; accordingly the interlocutory default judgment was set aside, but the 1st Defendant must pay the costs thrown away by his failure to file a defence in time.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory judgment dated 28 July 1973 set aside; 1st Defendant's application granted
Orders
- Interlocutory Judgment dated 28 July 1973 set aside
- 1st Defendant's application granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment