CHOW MING SZE and Another v. LAU YUET SHUENG and Another
The court held that the omission to file the affidavit of service was a minor irregularity properly condoned where the defendant had actual notice and suffered no prejudice, and that the defendants' case lacked a real prospect of success both on the evidence and in law because reliance on an unenforceable oral agreement for the sale of land impermissibly seeks to enforce rights contrary to the writing requirement; accordingly the appeal to set aside the judgment was dismissed.
- Citation
- CHOW MING SZE and Another v. LAU YUET SHUENG and Another
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: CHOW MING SZE and KOON TUNG YING, Administrators of the Estate of CHOW FUNG LING, deceased; Defendants: LAU YUET SHUENG and LAU CHI CHUNG
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 January 1998
- Case Number
- HCA1552/1997
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Claim for Recovery of Payments / Proprietary Interest in Land; Application to Set Aside Default Judgment / Appeal Against Registrar's Dismissal of Summons to Set Aside Default Judgment; Hearing in High Court (chambers)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Registrar's dismissal of summons affirmed; costs to plaintiffs.
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Default Judgment, Statute of Frauds / Writing Requirement for Land Transactions, Oral Agreement as Defence, Constructive/express Trust, Mortgage and Sale of Land
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHOW MING SZE and KOON TUNG YING, Administrators of the Estate of CHOW FUNG LING, deceased
Plaintiffs
LAU YUET SHUENG and LAU CHI CHUNG
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim for Recovery of Payments / Proprietary Interest in Land; Application to Set Aside Default Judgment / Appeal Against Registrar's Dismissal of Summons to Set Aside Default Judgment; Hearing in High Court (chambers)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether default judgment was irregular for failure to file affidavit of service under Order 19 r.8A(1)(b) and whether that irregularity requires setting aside without considering merits
- 2 Whether the defendants have a real prospect of success on the facts
- 3 Whether an alleged oral agreement for the sale of land can be relied on in defence where the agreement is not in writing
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the omission to file the affidavit of service was a minor irregularity properly condoned where the defendant had actual notice and suffered no prejudice, and that the defendants' case lacked a real prospect of success both on the evidence and in law because reliance on an unenforceable oral agreement for the sale of land impermissibly seeks to enforce rights contrary to the writing requirement; accordingly the appeal to set aside the judgment was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Registrar's dismissal of summons affirmed; costs to plaintiffs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Order nisi: defendants to pay the plaintiffs' costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment