BGPB v. KSW
Applying the welfare checklist and giving decisive weight to AB's educational needs, the demonstrated positive effect of increased time with the Father (Easter/Interim Order experience), the supportive findings in the Social Investigation Report and the need for immediate stability, the Court ordered the Father's proposed 2‑2‑5‑5 term‑time timetable to take effect immediately. The timetable and accessory orders best promote AB's welfare by increasing consistent parental support for schooling, reducing handovers and parental conflict, and preserving ties with the paternal family and French language exposure.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 1476
- Parties
- Plaintiff Father: BGPB; Defendant Mother: KSW
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2023
- Case Number
- HCMP1922/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Guardianship and Child Custody (ward of Court) / Substantive Hearing of Summonses for Defined Shared Care/control and Holiday Arrangements
- Outcome
- Court ordered immediate implementation of the Father's proposed 2‑2‑5‑5 term‑time timetable and made supplemental orders on holidays and passport renewal; dewarding and discharge of restraint on Mother's removal of AB from Hong Kong agreed by parties and approved.
- Legal Topics
- Shared Care and Control, Access and Contact, Child Welfare and Best Interests, Education Placement and School Stream, Passport and Travel Documents, Social Investigation Report
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BGPB
Plaintiff Father
KSW
Defendant Mother
Procedural Posture
Guardianship and Child Custody (ward of Court) / Substantive Hearing of Summonses for Defined Shared Care/control and Holiday Arrangements
Legal Issues
- 1 Term‑time care timetable and commencement
- 2 Allocation of single‑day holidays and staying access
- 3 2023 summer vacation arrangements and international handover
Ratio Decidendi
Applying the welfare checklist and giving decisive weight to AB's educational needs, the demonstrated positive effect of increased time with the Father (Easter/Interim Order experience), the supportive findings in the Social Investigation Report and the need for immediate stability, the Court ordered the Father's proposed 2‑2‑5‑5 term‑time timetable to take effect immediately. The timetable and accessory orders best promote AB's welfare by increasing consistent parental support for schooling, reducing handovers and parental conflict, and preserving ties with the paternal family and French language exposure.
Court Disposition
Court ordered immediate implementation of the Father's proposed 2‑2‑5‑5 term‑time timetable and made supplemental orders on holidays and passport renewal; dewarding and discharge of restraint on Mother's removal of AB from Hong Kong agreed by parties and approved.
Orders
- Term time access to follow Father's 2-2-5-5 proposal and to start immediately, subject to Ms Lau explaining the order to AB in person
- Single-day holidays to be shared equally by each party taking turns with staying access to commence from the time after school before that holiday
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment