陳雲及另一人 對 振威金屬有限公司及另二人
The court found the plaintiffs' account of an oral sale not credible on the evidence and contemporaneous conduct; even if an oral agreement had existed it was unenforceable because contracts for disposition of land require written signed evidence under Cap.219 s3; the 1999 transaction was completed with deposit paid by cheques and assignment executed, so defendants hold legal title; accordingly plaintiffs' proprietary claim failed and defendants were entitled to possession and to recover rent arrears, rates, ground rent and mesne profits as quantified by the court.
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 2911
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: CHAN WAN; Second Plaintiff, Personal Representative of the Estate of CHAN KAI WING: CHAN WAN; First Defendant: CHUN WAI METAL LIMITED; Second Defendant: HO KWOK WAI; Third Defendant, Personal Representative of the Estate of TANG PUI CHOI: HO KWOK WAI
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2021
- Case Number
- HCA947/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (property Dispute) / Judgment at Trial
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' claim for enforcement of the alleged oral sale dismissed; defendants entitled to possession and monetary awards for arrears and mesne profits; plaintiffs to pay defendants' costs
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Statute of Frauds/writing Requirement for Land Contracts (cap.219 S3), Possession and Mesne Profits, Limitation/abandonment of Claims, Credibility Assessment
- Source Language
- CH
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN WAN
First Plaintiff
CHAN WAN
Second Plaintiff, Personal Representative of the Estate of CHAN KAI WING
CHUN WAI METAL LIMITED
First Defendant
HO KWOK WAI
Second Defendant
HO KWOK WAI
Third Defendant, Personal Representative of the Estate of TANG PUI CHOI
Procedural Posture
Civil (property Dispute) / Judgment at Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an oral agreement for sale of land (July 2011) existed and was enforceable
- 2 Whether payment of HK$300,000 was part payment towards a purchase or payment of rent arrears
- 3 Whether the 1999 sale was completed and the defendants hold legal title
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the plaintiffs' account of an oral sale not credible on the evidence and contemporaneous conduct; even if an oral agreement had existed it was unenforceable because contracts for disposition of land require written signed evidence under Cap.219 s3; the 1999 transaction was completed with deposit paid by cheques and assignment executed, so defendants hold legal title; accordingly plaintiffs' proprietary claim failed and defendants were entitled to possession and to recover rent arrears, rates, ground rent and mesne profits as quantified by the court.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' claim for enforcement of the alleged oral sale dismissed; defendants entitled to possession and monetary awards for arrears and mesne profits; plaintiffs to pay defendants' costs
Orders
- Plaintiffs must deliver up vacant possession of the property to the defendants
- Plaintiffs must pay outstanding sums after deducting HK$300,000 paid: rent HK$386,710.00, rates HK$20,228.33 and ground rent HK$39,095.00
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment