PANG IENG LUN AND ANOTHER v. ZHANG ZHIJIAN
Court found on evidence Zhang was indebted and the RMB1,000,000 was a partial repayment; there was cessation of repayment within Clause15.5(1), Clause15.5 may be validly invoked by the other contractual shareholders only, and the Notice of Termination was validly served; accordingly Zhang is ordered to sell his shares under Clause10 by specific performance. On the counterclaim the court found the earlier declaration of trust had been extinguished by a transfer of beneficial interest to Lou in mid‑2019, so the 24 and 28 September 2021 transfers were not protected by the trust exception and are void; Ms Ma must transfer 20,000 shares back to Mr Lou.
- Citation
- [2026] HKCFI 2561
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Pang Ieng Lun (彭映鸞); 2nd Plaintiff: Lou Kim Neng (勞劍寧); Defendant (original Action) and Plaintiff (counterclaim): Zhang Zhijian (張志建); 3rd Defendant (by Counterclaim): Ma Kin Kwan (馬建軍); 4th Defendant (by Counterclaim): Ma Ka Ching (馬嘉靜)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 5 May 2026
- Case Number
- HCA1224/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Commercial Trial Contractual Dispute (shareholders Agreement) With Counterclaim / Trial Judgment (determination)
- Outcome
- Claims partly successful for plaintiffs and claimant on counterclaim; specific performance and declarations ordered with costs nisi orders
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Breach of Shareholders' Agreement, Share Transfer Restrictions, Declaration of Trust and Beneficial Ownership, Termination Clause (default), Effect of Foreign Judgment and Freezing Orders, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pang Ieng Lun (彭映鸞)
1st Plaintiff
Lou Kim Neng (勞劍寧)
2nd Plaintiff
Zhang Zhijian (張志建)
Defendant (original Action) and Plaintiff (counterclaim)
Ma Kin Kwan (馬建軍)
3rd Defendant (by Counterclaim)
Ma Ka Ching (馬嘉靜)
4th Defendant (by Counterclaim)
Procedural Posture
Civil Commercial Trial Contractual Dispute (shareholders Agreement) With Counterclaim / Trial Judgment (determination)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendant was indebted to PRC Company and whether RMB1,000,000 was partial repayment
- 2 Whether cessation of repayment triggered Clause 15.5 of the SHA
- 3 Whether Notice of Termination required service by non‑contractual shareholders or only contractual shareholders
Ratio Decidendi
Court found on evidence Zhang was indebted and the RMB1,000,000 was a partial repayment; there was cessation of repayment within Clause15.5(1), Clause15.5 may be validly invoked by the other contractual shareholders only, and the Notice of Termination was validly served; accordingly Zhang is ordered to sell his shares under Clause10 by specific performance. On the counterclaim the court found the earlier declaration of trust had been extinguished by a transfer of beneficial interest to Lou in mid‑2019, so the 24 and 28 September 2021 transfers were not protected by the trust exception and are void; Ms Ma must transfer 20,000 shares back to Mr Lou.
Court Disposition
Claims partly successful for plaintiffs and claimant on counterclaim; specific performance and declarations ordered with costs nisi orders
Orders
- Defendant Zhang Zhijian do sell his shares in the Company to Pang Ieng Lun and Lou Kim Neng in accordance with Clause 10 of the SHA
- Costs order nisi: Zhang Zhijian to pay costs of the claim to Pang Ieng Lun and Lou Kim Neng, to be taxed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment