RE IP LAI FAN

RE IP LAI FAN

Weighing prejudice to both parties, the court refused to lift the stay: applicants as laymen faced significant prejudice in handling legal issues under the Bankruptcy Ordinance, and respondent did not demonstrate irremediable prejudice from the stay; accordingly the respondent's summons to lift the stay was dismissed.

Citation
RE IP LAI FAN
Parties
Applicant Judgment Debtor: Ip Lai Fan; Applicant Judgment Debtor: Ip Lam On; Respondent Creditor: Respondent (bank)
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
3 November 2000
Case Number
HCSD10/2000
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Interlocutory (application for Lift of Stay)
Outcome
Respondent's summons to lift the stay dismissed; statutory stay remains in effect
Legal Topics
Statutory Demand, Stay of Proceedings, Legal Aid Application, Abuse of Process, Interpretation of Bankruptcy Ordinance, Guarantee and Security
Source Language
EN
Bankruptcy Civil Procedure Legal Aid Statutory Demand Stay of Proceedings Legal Aid Application Abuse of Process Interpretation of Bankruptcy Ordinance +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ip Lai Fan

Applicant Judgment Debtor

Ip Lam On

Applicant Judgment Debtor

Respondent (bank)

Respondent Creditor

Procedural Posture

Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Interlocutory (application for Lift of Stay)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether to lift the automatic 42‑day stay under the Legal Aid Ordinance following an application for legal aid
  2. 2 Whether the application for legal aid is an abuse of process
  3. 3 Assessment of prejudice to parties in deciding whether to lift the stay

Ratio Decidendi

Weighing prejudice to both parties, the court refused to lift the stay: applicants as laymen faced significant prejudice in handling legal issues under the Bankruptcy Ordinance, and respondent did not demonstrate irremediable prejudice from the stay; accordingly the respondent's summons to lift the stay was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Respondent's summons to lift the stay dismissed; statutory stay remains in effect

Orders

  • Respondent's summons to lift the stay dismissed