CHOI SIN FUN AND ANOTHER v. CHARTERED ENVIRONMENTALIST LTD AND ANOTHER
On the balance of probabilities the court found the Deceased was the employee of the 2nd Respondent and the 1st Respondent was the principal contractor; both respondents were therefore jointly liable under the Employees' Compensation Ordinance for statutory compensation and funeral expenses. The court awarded HK$771,160 as employees' compensation and HK$35,000 for funeral expenses, ordered interest at half the District Court judgment rate from the relevant dates to judgment and full judgment rate thereafter, awarded costs, and apportioned 95% of the compensation to the mother and 5% to the brother pursuant to section 6A.
- Citation
- CHOI SIN FUN AND ANOTHER v. CHARTERED ENVIRONMENTALIST LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Applicant (mother of the Deceased): Choi Sin Fun; Applicant (brother of the Deceased): Ng Chi Ho; 1st Respondent (principal Contractor): Chartered Environmentalist Limited (formerly Luen Fat Construction Limited); 2nd Respondent (employer): Ng Ka Wai (formerly trading as Co-Agent Electrical Project Company)
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2008
- Case Number
- DCEC1000/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Employees Compensation / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Applicants; 1st and 2nd Respondents held jointly liable
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Compensation, Employees Compensation Ordinance, Compulsory Insurance, Liability of Principal Contractor, Interest on Judgment, Apportionment of Award, Employees Compensation Assistance Board
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Choi Sin Fun
Applicant (mother of the Deceased)
Ng Chi Ho
Applicant (brother of the Deceased)
Chartered Environmentalist Limited (formerly Luen Fat Construction Limited)
1st Respondent (principal Contractor)
Ng Ka Wai (formerly trading as Co-Agent Electrical Project Company)
2nd Respondent (employer)
Procedural Posture
Employees Compensation / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Deceased was an employee of the 2nd Respondent at the time of the accident
- 2 Whether the 1st Respondent was the principal contractor and jointly liable for employees' compensation
- 3 Whether the 2nd Respondent breached the compulsory insurance requirement under the Ordinance
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the court found the Deceased was the employee of the 2nd Respondent and the 1st Respondent was the principal contractor; both respondents were therefore jointly liable under the Employees' Compensation Ordinance for statutory compensation and funeral expenses. The court awarded HK$771,160 as employees' compensation and HK$35,000 for funeral expenses, ordered interest at half the District Court judgment rate from the relevant dates to judgment and full judgment rate thereafter, awarded costs, and apportioned 95% of the compensation to the mother and 5% to the brother pursuant to section 6A.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Applicants; 1st and 2nd Respondents held jointly liable
Orders
- 1st and 2nd Respondents are jointly liable to pay employees' compensation of HK$771,160 to the Applicants under the Ordinance
- 1st and 2nd Respondents are jointly liable to pay funeral expenses of HK$35,000 to the Applicants under the Ordinance
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment