RE 符文珍
A statutory demand had been served and the debtor failed to put forward any sensible repayment proposal at repeated hearings; therefore the court properly exercised its discretion to make an immediate bankruptcy order.
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 3206
- Parties
- Petitioner: Petitioner; Debtor: Ms Fu; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 4 November 2024
- Case Number
- HCB5560/2024
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Hearing — Bankruptcy Order Made
- Outcome
- Immediate bankruptcy order made against the debtor (Ms Fu).
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Demand, Bankruptcy Order, Enforcement of Tribunal Judgments
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Petitioner
Petitioner
Ms Fu
Debtor
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Hearing — Bankruptcy Order Made
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory demand and unpaid tribunal judgments justify making a bankruptcy order
- 2 Whether the debtor made a reasonable proposal for repayment
- 3 Whether an immediate bankruptcy order is an appropriate exercise of the court's discretion
Ratio Decidendi
A statutory demand had been served and the debtor failed to put forward any sensible repayment proposal at repeated hearings; therefore the court properly exercised its discretion to make an immediate bankruptcy order.
Court Disposition
Immediate bankruptcy order made against the debtor (Ms Fu).
Orders
- Immediate bankruptcy order made against the debtor (Ms Fu).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment