LEUNG WAI KUEN v. HOSPITAL AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER
Section 69 MHO reaches acts done prior to and leading up to the making of a compulsory detention order, including medical examinations within the 7‑day period required for detention applications; accordingly the Small Claims proceedings concerning the Relevant Period fall within s.69 and must be stayed until the claimant obtains leave from the Court of First Instance under s.69, and the Adjudicator erred in refusing to stay without leave and in treating applicability as a matter requiring evidential trial in the SCT.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 3096
- Parties
- Claimant: Leung Wai Kuen; 1st Defendant: Hospital Authority; 2nd Defendant: Princess Margaret Hospital
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2020
- Case Number
- HCSA37/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Tribunal Appeal (court of First Instance) / Decision on Appeal (paper Disposal)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Adjudicator's order set aside; Small Claims Tribunal proceedings stayed until claimant obtains leave under s.69 MHO.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Immunity, Section 69 MHO, Stay of Proceedings, Leave to Sue Requirement
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leung Wai Kuen
Claimant
Hospital Authority
1st Defendant
Princess Margaret Hospital
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Tribunal Appeal (court of First Instance) / Decision on Appeal (paper Disposal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.69 MHO covers acts done prior to and leading up to the making of a compulsory detention order
- 2 Whether the Adjudicator was required to hear evidence before deciding applicability of s.69 MHO
Ratio Decidendi
Section 69 MHO reaches acts done prior to and leading up to the making of a compulsory detention order, including medical examinations within the 7‑day period required for detention applications; accordingly the Small Claims proceedings concerning the Relevant Period fall within s.69 and must be stayed until the claimant obtains leave from the Court of First Instance under s.69, and the Adjudicator erred in refusing to stay without leave and in treating applicability as a matter requiring evidential trial in the SCT.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Adjudicator's order set aside; Small Claims Tribunal proceedings stayed until claimant obtains leave under s.69 MHO.
Orders
- Order setting aside the Adjudicator's order dated 20 September 2019
- Stay of the Small Claims Tribunal proceedings until the claimant obtains leave from the Court of First Instance under s.69 of the Mental Health Ordinance
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment