LCK v. DLKY Committee of the Estate of WSY, appointed by the Order of Deputy High Court Judge L. Chan dated 13 August 2012 under HCMH Nos. 78 and 80 of 2011 AND OTHERS
The court was satisfied WSY lacked testamentary capacity and that making a statutory will and settling a New CK Trust best advanced WSY's paramount interests; the statutory will adopted distributions and trust terms that, on the evidence and by inference from WSY's character and family circumstances, reflect what she would have reasonably done if notionally restored to capacity; accordingly the Impugned Transactions were set aside by concession, the New CK Trust and statutory will were ordered in specified terms, and costs were apportioned and taxed as described.
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 496
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hcmh 7/2016): LCK; 1st Defendant (committee of the Estate of Wsy); Plaintiff (hca 398/2017): DLKY; 2nd Defendant (guardian Ad Litem of Ck): MJW; 3rd Defendant: LCC; 4th Defendant (deceased): LKF; 5th Defendant: LKC (5th); 6th Defendant: LKC (6th); 7th Defendant: LCT; 8th Defendant: LCT2; 9th Defendant: CZY; 10th Defendant: CYC (10th); 11th Defendant: CHZ; 12th Defendant: CYC (12th)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2022
- Case Number
- HCMH7/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Statutory Will Under Mental Health Ordinance and Related High Court Action to Set Aside Transactions / Judgment and Reasons With Decision on Costs (order Dated 9 February 2021; Reasons 17 February 2022)
- Outcome
- Order made for statutory will to be executed for WSY; New CK Trust approved and to be established; Impugned Transactions set aside by concession; costs orders made as to payment out of estate with limited exceptions and a nisi costs order in the HC Action.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Will, Testamentary Capacity, Lifetime Settlement, Trust V Outright Gift, Setting Aside Transactions for Incapacity, Costs Orders
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LCK
Plaintiff (hcmh 7/2016)
DLKY
1st Defendant (committee of the Estate of Wsy); Plaintiff (hca 398/2017)
MJW
2nd Defendant (guardian Ad Litem of Ck)
LCC
3rd Defendant
LKF
4th Defendant (deceased)
LKC (5th)
5th Defendant
LKC (6th)
6th Defendant
LCT
7th Defendant
LCT2
8th Defendant
CZY
9th Defendant
CYC (10th)
10th Defendant
CHZ
11th Defendant
CYC (12th)
12th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Statutory Will Under Mental Health Ordinance and Related High Court Action to Set Aside Transactions / Judgment and Reasons With Decision on Costs (order Dated 9 February 2021; Reasons 17 February 2022)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should exercise its power under s10B MHO to make a statutory will for WSY
- 2 Whether WSY lacked testamentary capacity at relevant times
- 3 Whether to set aside the Impugned Transactions and prior wills
Ratio Decidendi
The court was satisfied WSY lacked testamentary capacity and that making a statutory will and settling a New CK Trust best advanced WSY's paramount interests; the statutory will adopted distributions and trust terms that, on the evidence and by inference from WSY's character and family circumstances, reflect what she would have reasonably done if notionally restored to capacity; accordingly the Impugned Transactions were set aside by concession, the New CK Trust and statutory will were ordered in specified terms, and costs were apportioned and taxed as described.
Court Disposition
Order made for statutory will to be executed for WSY; New CK Trust approved and to be established; Impugned Transactions set aside by concession; costs orders made as to payment out of estate with limited exceptions and a nisi costs order in the HC Action.
Orders
- Statutory will for WSY made by order dated 9 February 2021 and executed on 10 February 2021
- Impugned Transactions (2003 POAs, 2004 POAs, KH/CH/ET/FC transfers, 2003 and 2004 Wills and associated assignments) set aside pursuant to concessions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment