MA PO CHIM, PERCY AND OTHERS v. LEE TUNG HAI, LEO AND OTHERS
The application to stay execution was dismissed because the Association failed to demonstrate good reasons: it did not show the appeal would be rendered nugatory nor that the appeal was almost bound to succeed. The Association's grounds were at best arguable and not overwhelmingly in its favor; Horwath's role was administrative and factual disputes (including unsigned fee agreements) meant the appeal was not almost certain to succeed; Horwath offered a bank guarantee and the court should not stay execution on the present material.
- Citation
- MA PO CHIM, PERCY AND OTHERS v. LEE TUNG HAI, LEO AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Applicants/petitioners: Petitioners; 3rd Respondent: Chungshan Commercial Association; 4th Respondent: Mo Loong Kwong; 5th Respondent: Lee Dai Chung; 6th Respondent: Yuen Cho Mo; Independent Professional/fee Claimant: Horwath Corporate Advisory Services Ltd.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2007
- Case Number
- HCMP3253/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S.168 a Companies Ordinance Concerning Stay of Execution Pending Appeal and Taxation Basis of Fees / Interim Application Heard in Chambers; Application to Stay Execution Dismissed on 13 June 2007; Reasons Handed Down 20 June 2007
- Outcome
- Application to stay execution dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution Pending Appeal, Basis of Taxation of Fees (trustee Vs Common Fund), Right to Be Heard, Appointment and Remuneration of Independent Professionals
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Petitioners
Applicants/petitioners
Chungshan Commercial Association
3rd Respondent
Mo Loong Kwong
4th Respondent
Lee Dai Chung
5th Respondent
Yuen Cho Mo
6th Respondent
Horwath Corporate Advisory Services Ltd.
Independent Professional/fee Claimant
Procedural Posture
Application Under S.168 a Companies Ordinance Concerning Stay of Execution Pending Appeal and Taxation Basis of Fees / Interim Application Heard in Chambers; Application to Stay Execution Dismissed on 13 June 2007; Reasons Handed Down 20 June 2007
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether execution of orders directing taxation of fees on trustee basis should be stayed pending appeal
- 2 Whether Horwath falls within category of "other officers" entitling it to trustee basis taxation
- 3 Whether the Association was deprived of a right to be heard before the fee orders were made
Ratio Decidendi
The application to stay execution was dismissed because the Association failed to demonstrate good reasons: it did not show the appeal would be rendered nugatory nor that the appeal was almost bound to succeed. The Association's grounds were at best arguable and not overwhelmingly in its favor; Horwath's role was administrative and factual disputes (including unsigned fee agreements) meant the appeal was not almost certain to succeed; Horwath offered a bank guarantee and the court should not stay execution on the present material.
Court Disposition
Application to stay execution dismissed
Orders
- Application dismissed
- Costs to follow the event
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment